Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 27

Thread: Why the NFL sucks

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    17,250 miles East of Spokane
    Posts
    17,511

    Default Why the NFL sucks

    I'm not a Cleveland fan, but I was rooting for them to get into the playoffs due to their underdog persona. That said, it is a travesty that the Indy Colts played backups for almost the entire game. Then, they didn't even try to get the ball back at the end. I hope it comes back and bites them in the playoffs.

    Could you imagine in that happening in college football? USC wraps up the Pac 10 with a game to go, so they play all back-ups vs. UCLA. Just terrible.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    1,604

    Default

    The Colts had nothing to gain from winning the game. There was no real reason to jeopardize players for a virtually meaningless game. They got their snaps in and left on a good note and thats that. I get your point but understand why the Colts did that. The Browns had a chance to lock up the playoffs last week and their QB came out and laid an egg.

    I could imagine USC playing backups against UCLA if they had the Pac-10 locked up because USC's second string would probably beat UCLA's starters. =)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    14,692

    Default

    While I agree that it sucks that teams don't always give 100% on this final weekend, I also think that if a team is in the position where they have to rely on other teams to win or lose to get into the playoffs, then they really shouldn't complain. If they take care of business and win, then they don't have to rely on other teams to win for them.
    'I found it is the small everyday deeds of ordinary folk that keep the darkness at bay… small acts of kindness and love.'
    - Gandalf the Grey

    ________________________________



    Foo Time

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    17,250 miles East of Spokane
    Posts
    17,511

    Default

    I'm not lamenting about the Browns. I agree that they could have taken control of their own destiny against the Bengals. I just think its pathetic that about half of the games were meaningless with starters not playing very much or at all. And to have any playoff position determined by this is just wrong.

    I don't like either the Pats or the Giants. But I respect the hell out of how they approached the final game. I think Belicheck (sp?) would have played it the same if they had a loss.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    14,692

    Default

    That, without a doubt, was the most entertaining game of the weekend and one of the better games this season. As you said, the remarkable thing is neither team needed this game, it was pure pride.
    'I found it is the small everyday deeds of ordinary folk that keep the darkness at bay… small acts of kindness and love.'
    - Gandalf the Grey

    ________________________________



    Foo Time

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    City of Trees
    Posts
    200

    Default

    and it was a DAMN good game to watch. Eli certainly came out throwing.

    but back to the initial thread posting. I just don't think that its worth risking injury to some of your best players especially on the last game of the reg season.
    "SLAINTE"

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Spokane WA.
    Posts
    2,129

    Default We are used to it.

    You all see my Brown's hat. Since 1957. As much as I hate to say it, most of you are right, all they had to do was win last week, but they did not. But I will say this, watch out for next season, the Brownies will be very tough.
    [/QUOTE]“Sometimes a player's greatest challenge is coming to grips with his role on the team.”
    ― Scottie Pippen

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    City of Trees
    Posts
    200

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HillBillyZag View Post
    You all see my Brown's hat. Since 1957. As much as I hate to say it, most of you are right, all they had to do was win last week, but they did not. But I will say this, watch out for next season, the Brownies will be very tough.
    I think most real fanatics of one team would say the same thing though.

    Heck, Ima 9ers fan, and thats all that left any other 9er fan at the end of last season. Needless to say we ended on a solid 5-11.

    However, I'd love to see the Browns do well...I think I've only been alive to see 2 winning seasons or so.
    "SLAINTE"

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BroncoZAG615 View Post
    The Colts had nothing to gain from winning the game. There was no real reason to jeopardize players for a virtually meaningless game.
    They're professionals. I'd expect professionals to actually earn their paychecks.

    A team should be fined and lose a draft pick or two if they mail it in at the end of a season. It's a disservice to the fans, to the opposing teams and to the league.

    It's unsportsmanlike in the extreme.
    There's no such thing as "garbage time" - there's only the time to crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their women.

    That is what is best about being a Zag.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    14,692

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brasszag View Post
    It's unsportsmanlike in the extreme.
    It's good business, though.
    'I found it is the small everyday deeds of ordinary folk that keep the darkness at bay… small acts of kindness and love.'
    - Gandalf the Grey

    ________________________________



    Foo Time

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    East Tennessee
    Posts
    118

    Default

    Being a big Titans fan, I'll say I'm glad with Dungy's decision. The one thing that disturbed me the most was when he didn't use his TO in the final seconds. As a football fan, that made me very angry. Also, I must say that Cleveland had there oppurtunity, but crumbled against Cincy. It doesn't bother me that Dungy did what he had to do to rest his team, but for him to blatently quit with time on the clock like that, upsests me as a football fan.
    I'm a Vol fan, I come in peace, I'll be a reasonable, level-headed fan. At least I'll try

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kitzbuel View Post
    It's good business, though.
    It compromises the integrity of the product though.

    If I'm watching a game I want to see the best 60 minutes of ball possible. Not a great 30 minutes and 30 so-so minutes.

    I want both teams to always play full out - that's why I've been enjoying watching the Pats this year.

    I know they're going to play for 60 minutes with intensity and purpose.
    There's no such thing as "garbage time" - there's only the time to crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their women.

    That is what is best about being a Zag.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    East Tennessee
    Posts
    118

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brasszag View Post
    It compromises the integrity of the product though.

    If I'm watching a game I want to see the best 60 minutes of ball possible. Not a great 30 minutes and 30 so-so minutes.

    I want both teams to always play full out - that's why I've been enjoying watching the Pats this year.

    I know they're going to play for 60 minutes with intensity and purpose.
    I bet if they were 14-1 they would have rested a majority of their starters in the 2nd half. Bill has done that in the past
    I'm a Vol fan, I come in peace, I'll be a reasonable, level-headed fan. At least I'll try

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    1,604

    Default

    Brass, what would you say about teams that are up 30+ points at the third quarter. Keep starters in? Otherwise you wouldn't be seeing the best 60 minutes of each team.

    I don't mind sitting players when all is secured because their are 53 men on a football team and all make monetary amounts dwarfing the average American. Let them get in there and bang around a little bit.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,329

    Default

    How is playing the backups for 60 minutes better than baseball expanding the rosters for september? Suddenly, during the most important stretch of the season the teams get to call up 15 players from the minors to rest their regular guys. That's more than just 1 game being played by backups.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    East Tennessee
    Posts
    118

    Default

    I read a link earlier of an article saying that the Colt had communication with the Titans and they told them they would not use their TO to force a change of possession giving them yet another oppurtunity to have won the game.
    I'm a Vol fan, I come in peace, I'll be a reasonable, level-headed fan. At least I'll try

  17. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BroncoZAG615 View Post
    Brass, what would you say about teams that are up 30+ points at the third quarter. Keep starters in? Otherwise you wouldn't be seeing the best 60 minutes of each team.
    That's a good time to rotate in reserves so that they can get some game-speed reps with some of the starters. There's purpose there.

    But, as I mentioned above, I expect 60 minutes of "intensity and purpose", and I would expect the subs to play to increase the lead.

    I cannot stand coaches benching players for the sole purpose of preventing injuries in already healthy players. Resting hurting players - fine. Getting subs reps - fine.
    There's no such thing as "garbage time" - there's only the time to crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their women.

    That is what is best about being a Zag.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,347

    Default

    I find it hard to think the NFL sucks in this regard, at least when compared to college football.

    It's only the 12th or 13th best team getting "screwed" in the NFL, meaning that they lost 6 or 7 games. They shouldn't be crying about what the Colts and Pats do at the end of the season.
    In college, you'll see the 2nd or 3rd best teams (like Auburn a few years back) or a team close to that (Missouri this year) getting screwed.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Mt Fuji, Japan
    Posts
    31,321

    Default

    1. You don't belong in the playoffs if you can't get the bottom wild card.

    2. If you've won enough games that you can rest your starters at the end of the regular season, you have every right to do so.
    Go Zags!!! Just Foo'in around.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    14,692

    Default

    It's kind of the same thing in European soccer where they use goal differentials to determine teams advancing. A team with a several goal lead in the overall series will essentially toss the last game as long as they hold onto their lead in overall goals.
    'I found it is the small everyday deeds of ordinary folk that keep the darkness at bay… small acts of kindness and love.'
    - Gandalf the Grey

    ________________________________



    Foo Time

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Opportunity, WA
    Posts
    1,715

    Default

    The NFL does not suck because of this ... once a team locks in to a seed, the game has no value. The whole point of the season is to achieve a seed and the nearly universal empashis by fans about post season success reinfoces such approach.
    Agent provocateur

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    South Hill, Spokane
    Posts
    4,430

    Default

    In college, you'll see the 2nd or 3rd best teams (like Auburn a few years back) or a team close to that (Missouri this year) getting screwed.
    like USC this year, which i might add is the best team in college football right now. wheres my playoff? but back to the point, in ANY sport if the best teams rest their players at the end of the regular season and a middle of the pack club misses the playoffs from ithat you cant be mad. win enough games that you make it no matter what other teams do, or who they sub.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    17,250 miles East of Spokane
    Posts
    17,511

    Default

    All games should count. When I play flag football, I want to win, so should professionals.

    Also, college does need a playoff. But Auburn helped "screw" themselves with a ridiculously easy OOC. Now Oregon in 2001, they got shafted. (Nebraska got in after being destroyed by Colorado in their last game. Miami killed Nebraska, Oregon punished Colorado.)

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    East Tennessee
    Posts
    118

    Default

    Oklahoma and Nebraska both got an extremely lucky benefit from the BCS after getting blown out in their Conference Championship game and still able to make it to the BCS Title game
    I'm a Vol fan, I come in peace, I'll be a reasonable, level-headed fan. At least I'll try

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,347

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 23dpg View Post
    Also, college does need a playoff. But Auburn helped "screw" themselves with a ridiculously easy OOC.
    Maybe Oklahoma and USC were more qualified ,but it was sad to see Auburn get left out. When a team is that good there is a big "what if" factor, be it Auburn, Oregon, even Bosie St.....

    That "what if" factor isn't there (at least not near as much) with Syracuse getting left out of last year's NCAA bb or with Cleveland getting knocked out because they didn't win as much as they needed to in previous weeks.

    Make a tourney in college football so people cry about the 9th or 17th best team being left out. Not the 3rd best.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •