Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Oklahoma St 2022 post-season ban

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,246

    Default Oklahoma St 2022 post-season ban

    https://www.cbssports.com/college-ba...ng-violations/

    "The NCAA also upheld all of its original punishments, sources said, including a three-year probationary period that will start effective immediately and end Nov. 3, 2024; a scholarship reduction of three over an unspecified period of time; and other recruiting restrictions (such as fewer days on the road, fewer official visits and phone call limitations) that were previously put in place and adhered to by Oklahoma State."

    The NCAA managed to drag it out long enough to get Cade Cunningham in the tournament for 2 games.

    I doubt this has much of an effect on the Anthony Black recruitment.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Oklafriggenhoma
    Posts
    7,695

    Default

    Just wait till Kansas gets a slap on the wrist

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,834

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scrooner View Post
    https://www.cbssports.com/college-ba...ng-violations/

    "The NCAA also upheld all of its original punishments, sources said, including a three-year probationary period that will start effective immediately and end Nov. 3, 2024; a scholarship reduction of three over an unspecified period of time; and other recruiting restrictions (such as fewer days on the road, fewer official visits and phone call limitations) that were previously put in place and adhered to by Oklahoma State."

    The NCAA managed to drag it out long enough to get Cade Cunningham in the tournament for 2 games.

    I doubt this has much of an effect on the Anthony Black recruitment.
    Hard to tell that, don't you think? The kid might really want to play in the NCAA tournament and Ok St., currently the frontrunner, has been banned from it.

    EDIT: nevermind, the ban is for this year's tournament in the '21-'22 season, not '22-'23 when Black would be present

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,834

    Default

    On a related note; how unfair is it for the kids currently in the program that were still in high school when all the shenanigans went down? I never understood the postseason ban; why not just require Ok St. to forfeit their NCAA share(s) if they would be selected to the tournament instead? That would punish the school, not the kids.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by strikenowhere View Post
    Hard to tell that, don't you think? The kid might really want to play in the NCAA tournament and Ok St., currently the frontrunner, has been banned from it.

    EDIT: nevermind, the ban is for this year's tournament in the '21-'22 season, not '22-'23 when Black would be present
    They also get: a scholarship reduction of three over an unspecified period of time
    Probably the only Gonzaga fan in Ireland!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,246

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by strikenowhere View Post
    On a related note; how unfair is it for the kids currently in the program that were still in high school when all the shenanigans went down? I never understood the postseason ban; why not just require Ok St. to forfeit their NCAA share(s) if they would be selected to the tournament instead? That would punish the school, not the kids.
    What's wild is that Oklahoma St got 4 transfers this year, from Memphis, Kansas, Texas Tech & Syracuse, all likely to be tournament teams.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,246

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scrooner View Post
    I doubt this has much of an effect on the Anthony Black recruitment.
    I have no inside knowledge whatsoever -- this is just me being cynical.

    Ok St will lose some scholarships, but I think they're going to make room for their top PG target who is a heavy lean. The one thing is DOES change is that Black probably won't graduate early to go play for them this season (remember, his high school career is now over).

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    309

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by strikenowhere View Post
    On a related note; how unfair is it for the kids currently in the program that were still in high school when all the shenanigans went down? I never understood the postseason ban; why not just require Ok St. to forfeit their NCAA share(s) if they would be selected to the tournament instead? That would punish the school, not the kids.
    Couldn't agree more. The NCAA is punishing innocent athletes. In some cases, the coaches that participated in the violations are gone and are left unpunished.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    At a time when the microscope is already on the NCAA, it's not a good time to be making people angry. It looks like Arizona is in the clear though... so I guess Tommy might be in the tournament.
    Quote Originally Posted by Reborn View Post
    Go Zags!!!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colville, Wa.
    Posts
    15,306

    Default

    Guess that spells impending doom for Pacific.
    But we don't play nobody.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Hilton Head (Bluffton), SC
    Posts
    5,343

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sittingon50 View Post
    Guess that spells impending doom for Pacific.
    Rumor mill says UOP lost five scholarships as punishment...one would think they would have learned something over the past three years...sheesh

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •