Originally posted by jazzdelmar
View Post
2019-20 MBB Schedule Discussion Thread
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by DixieZag View PostJazz can speak for himself, seems to me that he is saying - and it is a defensible position - that the low end could be a little higher just for seeding purposes, that is all. Playing a team that is ranked 160 would seem to be better than playing the one at 260.
I think that is the only legitimate point, and I even wonder if they have much choice, after the bigger games are scheduled for TV and all, they might be pinned into a corner on available dates.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ZagRecruitWatch View PostI disagree I think it is a incredibly ridiculous argument which is one of the reasons Jazz is probably making it. There is not a team out there that will schedule P5 teams back to back all non-conference long. The fact of the matter is we play in the conference we are in and we pretty much have to win it outright to get a top seed. Scheduling a absurdly difficult non-conference schedule won't mean #### if we lose the games and play poorly in conference play. The non-conference schedule is to introduce gonzaga to teams with superior athletes who we will most likely face in later rounds of the tournament. In RPI that would make a difference but with the new Quadrant metric not so much.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ZagRecruitWatch View PostThere is not a team out there that will schedule P5 teams back to back all non-conference long. The fact of the matter is we play in the conference we are in and we pretty much have to win it outright to get a top seed. Scheduling a absurdly difficult non-conference schedule won't mean #### if we lose the games and play poorly in conference play.
As to comparing w/ Duke's nonconference sched, power 5 teams +BE only need a few tough early games to sharpen them. They don't need them for seeding purposes like GU does, so it's apples to oranges. Hence the usual inverted schedule.
Comment
-
-
I'm not sure if it's taking effect this year but I seem to recall that most of the P5 were expanding their conference schedules to 20 games...I would guess that makes it tougher to get some of them to agree to a home and home with us. Even the middle tier P5 schools lose some of their drive to agree to tougher Non-Con games since they will be playing all the top dogs in their conference twice.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by bdmiller7 View PostI can think of 2 teams that traditionally go P5 all non-conference... LBSU and Texas So, but they're in a little different circumstances than GU.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by maynard g krebs View PostI don't think anyone is saying that, re first sentence above. Half a dozen quality nonconf opponents seems ok for a team w/ limited experience together; I think last year it was 8 or 9? Someone on SMC's board did a comp of our sched w/ theirs based on last yr's final kenpom rankings. The Zags play 7 teams ranked 195 or lower last yr; SMC plays 3. Writer jokingly complained about Zags schedule bringing down SMC's rpi. Maybe it's unavoidable as Dixie suggests it might be, but it's a legit issue that jazz brings up imo.
As to comparing w/ Duke's nonconference sched, power 5 teams +BE only need a few tough early games to sharpen them. They don't need them for seeding purposes like GU does, so it's apples to oranges. Hence the usual inverted schedule.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ZagRecruitWatch View PostSomeone should have told him that RPI was a arbitrary metric last year.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ZagRecruitWatch View PostI disagree I think it is a incredibly ridiculous argument which is one of the reasons Jazz is probably making it. There is not a team out there that will schedule P5 teams back to back all non-conference long. The fact of the matter is we play in the conference we are in and we pretty much have to win it outright to get a top seed. Scheduling a absurdly difficult non-conference schedule won't mean #### if we lose the games and play poorly in conference play. The non-conference schedule is to introduce gonzaga to teams with superior athletes who we will most likely face in later rounds of the tournament. In RPI that would make a difference but with the new Quadrant metric not so much.
No one said play nothing but P-5 teams over and over.
The ONLY argument that I think is even defensible is that once you play your P-5 school with a top 75 rating, perhaps load up on a softie that is about 140 on the list instead of 260-300.
It keeps the entire RPI of the schedule higher for MM.
But, as I also said, it could well be that they simply don't have the flexibility required to call the shots on a team at 140, given that they prioritized the two TV games before and after, it left them with a date to play a game with very little flexibility, they couldn't be picky.
I would bet anything that is what happened.
Framed that way, in an ideal world, there is nothing ridiculous about it. There could easily be a better way, should they have complete freedom, but it isn't ridiculous.Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
Mark Twain.
Comment
-
-
Thread Retitled and Stickied for time being.The GUB Resource Library: Links to: Stats, Blogs, Brackets, & More. . .
“They go to school. They do their homework. They shake hands. They say please and thank you. But once you throw that ball up, they will rip your heart out and watch you bleed.” -- Jay Bilas
Comment
-
Comment