Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 27

Thread: ESPN Bracketology (5-16-19).....amazing Zags a 2 seed.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    11,992

    Default ESPN Bracketology (5-16-19).....amazing Zags a 2 seed.

    http://www.espn.com/mens-college-bas...l/bracketology

    Looks like even without the 3 (maybe 4) leaving us, Joey still think we have a majorly winning team. We'll know more after the draft but we do know 3 are leaving.. I think we'll be alright. Big question mark is Tillie.

    Top 10 come October (crossing fingers).

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    17,642

    Default

    Absolutely more meaningless than most.

    With one exception.

    The fact that we're a two seed with most our team leaving is a testament to Mark Few and staff, and their ability to now field a team that will be top 10 near every year. That is what I am seeing. Recognition that Few and company are now at a level that the expectation, with recruits and transfers is that we'll have a team that is top 10, 15, or so, and I think that DOES mean something.
    Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
    Mark Twain.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    470

    Default

    I think it is about time people stop complaining about Gonzaga not getting respect nationally from the media. Because those days are long gone. GU has been getting lots of love in recent years.

    We'll see how the rest of the offseason plays out but this team could possibly contend for such a high seed. They also might just sneak into the tourney if things go awry.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Twin Cities
    Posts
    3,205

    Default

    Lose 4 starters and our 6th man & 8th man declare for NBA draft.

    2 seed on reputation and respect alone.

    Incredible, really.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    573

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DixieZag View Post
    Absolutely more meaningless than most.

    With one exception.

    The fact that we're a two seed with most our team leaving is a testament to Mark Few and staff, and their ability to now field a team that will be top 10 near every year. That is what I am seeing. Recognition that Few and company are now at a level that the expectation, with recruits and transfers is that we'll have a team that is top 10, 15, or so, and I think that DOES mean something.
    Quote Originally Posted by Goshzagit View Post
    Lose 4 starters and our 6th man & 8th man declare for NBA draft.

    2 seed on reputation and respect alone.

    Incredible, really.
    These.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Chattaroy
    Posts
    3,380

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DixieZag View Post
    Absolutely more meaningless than most.

    With one exception.

    The fact that we're a two seed with most our team leaving is a testament to Mark Few and staff, and their ability to now field a team that will be top 10 near every year. That is what I am seeing. Recognition that Few and company are now at a level that the expectation, with recruits and transfers is that we'll have a team that is top 10, 15, or so, and I think that DOES mean something.
    Yeppers. Helps that there are some good guys coming in too. Lots of time between now and November .... It’ll be fun to watch a slew of new Zags + see how those returning have improved. Should be a whole different flavor of Zags what with Rui, Brandon, Zach and Josh gone .... and likely 1-2 others.
    http://www.fowlplaces.com/zags/GoZagsTinySignGuyGlassesColor.png

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    11,992

    Default

    And I suppose you would be just as unenthused if we were a 10 seed? No. It’s earlyand you ant hang hour hat on ‘tis but it means we have a very good team coming up. Better than most of the nation.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    968

    Default

    If they were ranked as the number one team, I literally wouldn’t care at this point. There’s a lot of pieces to bring together at this point!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Richland, Washington
    Posts
    6,462

    Default

    What is there? Something like 300+ players with the mindset that it is time to move on from college ball or their current team? This snapshot in time reflects that.

    There are a heck of a lot of teams that are potentially in the rebuild/reload mode right now. The roster churn in modern college basketball is nothing short of breathtaking.

    Any speculation at this particular time is based upon any given program's track record and certainly can't take rosters into account. The grad transfers haven't even all committed yet.

    Now, more than ever, you have to take into account the teams that will retain the majority of their roster. Isn't SMC one of those? (even though I hate their transition to a dribble isolation offense)
    I miss Mike Hart

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Spokane Valley
    Posts
    8,051

    Default

    College basketball rankings: Texas Tech jumps in early Top 25 And 1 after bringing in talented transfers

    10
    team logo GONZAGA

    Coach: Mark Few

    2018-19 record: 33-4

    Notable players definitely gone: Brandon Clarke, Rui Hachimura, Zach Norvell, Josh Perkins, Geno Crandall, Jeremy Jones

    Other expected departures: N/A

    Notable players expected to return: Corey Kispert, Killian Tillie, Filip Petrusev, Joel Ayayi

    Expected additions: Admon Gilder, Drew Timme, Anton Watson, Pavel Zakharov, Oumar Ballo, Martynas Arlauskas, Brock Ravet

    https://www.cbssports.com/college-ba...ted-transfers/

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    On an island that is long
    Posts
    12,581

    Default

    Appreciate the confidence they have in Few and Co. but I think the youth of this team will slow the progression some. 20+ wins will happen... don't see 30 in the cards... don't see high 20s in the cards and I think that is what would be needed for a 2 seed. My gut says Zags drop 4 or so in OOC and probably 2 in conf. Ceiling is probably 5 or 6 seed. JMHO
    "And Morrison? He did what All-Americans do. He shot daggers in the daylight and stole a win." - Steve Kelley (Seattle Times)

    "Gonzaga is a special place, with special people!" - Dan Dickau #21

    Foo me once shame on you, Foo me twice shame on me.

    2012 Foostrodamus - Foothsayer of Death

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    329

    Default

    I don't know. If our defense comes together (this will be a frustrating year for missed assignments) this team is going to be a lot of fun. 2 seed would be this teams ceiling though. Gut feeling says a 3 to 4 seed with some serious momentum. We drop 2 in the WCC, just too much talent vs. not enough.

  13. #13

    Default

    We are really going to miss Brandon's rim protection. I don't see anyone filling those shoes coming in. That being said, I'm excited to see the progress of this new young team. It might take 3/4 of the season before they start to gel offensively and defensively

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    403

    Default

    A 2 seed would mean no more than 3 loses all season. Just don't see that happening

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,033

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IowaSERE View Post
    A 2 seed would mean no more than 3 loses all season. Just don't see that happening
    It would also mean that GU would be in Spokane the first weekend!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    6,386

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IowaSERE View Post
    A 2 seed would mean no more than 3 loses all season. Just don't see that happening
    I tend to agree about no more than 3 losses part, but I do believe that 3-5 Gonzaga will have as good a front court as anyone in the country. The 1-2 will both be new players and will be a challenge and yet Admon will be a great defensive presence and Ravet should prove to be a scorer and passer. The addition of one more be all it takes to cement the guards. I also believe that, in his third year in the program, Ayayi will have learned both the offensive and defensive rotations and will be a surprise.

    The question I ask you is, which teams in the NCAA will have 3 or fewer losses next year? I have seen a lot of player churn on all the top teams, and what Gonzaga is bringing in should be as good, and may be better than most of them.
    Hoping you have a sense of humor too!

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by willandi View Post
    I tend to agree about no more than 3 losses part, but I do believe that 3-5 Gonzaga will have as good a front court as anyone in the country. The 1-2 will both be new players and will be a challenge and yet Admon will be a great defensive presence and Ravet should prove to be a scorer and passer. The addition of one more be all it takes to cement the guards. I also believe that, in his third year in the program, Ayayi will have learned both the offensive and defensive rotations and will be a surprise.

    The question I ask you is, which teams in the NCAA will have 3 or fewer losses next year? I have seen a lot of player churn on all the top teams, and what Gonzaga is bringing in should be as good, and may be better than most of them.
    Most teams will have 3 or more losses, but they play in a power conference

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    6,386

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IowaSERE View Post
    Most teams will have 3 or more losses, but they play in a power conference
    They did last year too!
    Hoping you have a sense of humor too!

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Spokane
    Posts
    962

    Default

    I wonder if people actually get paid a salary to do these ridiculous projections in May. I find it kind of humorous

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    11,578

    Default

    I've always felt that Joe Lunardi does a pretty good job with his analyses. He's certainly been close to predicting Gonzaga's success over the last few years. I feel the same way about Gonzaga that Joe does. I think they're going to be really good next year. To see Gonzaga at number two in the West at this time of year really does make me happy, and I certainly like being happy. It also makes me excited for next year in a way that I might not be as excited if Lundardi has the Zags at number 8 or 9. I also like seeing St Mary's at 7. That's really cool and this will make our games with them more intense.

    The Kool-aid is tasting good, but darn, where's the sunshine and heat? I'm getting tired of the rain.

    Go Zags!!!
    Go Zags!!! The Best Is Yet To Come!!!

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Hilton Head (Bluffton), SC
    Posts
    4,403

    Default

    IMO...I believe we seem to take BC & Rui somewhat for granted...they were both "freaks" (in a good way) in that we might never see the skill set those two had playing again in the same season...I don't believe we have any recruits coming in next year that can compare to those two...Next season is going to be a hope that we bend-but-don't-break kind of year...I trust in Few and want to believe we are the "fifth" best team in the latest bracketology but realistically, I see us as a solid Top-25 team, with the potential of having another SS season...NOW 2020 will be an entirely different outcome altogether...

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Twin Cities
    Posts
    3,205

    Default

    A 2 seed is not in the works.

    Flattering, yes, but we are reloading with freshman & somewhat inconsistent players.

    If we make our 21st Tourney, it will an amazingly successful year imho.

    Have an inkling we will absolutely need to win the WCC Tournament to punch our ticket.

    With the development of our youth, we will be at our best by next February/March, so if we do make the Tourney, we could be a dangerous 9, 10, 11 seed type team. Maybe even Sweet 16 good.

    All this could change, of course, IF Tillie returns. And we add another grad transfer guard.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    5,955

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Goshzagit View Post
    if we do make the Tourney, we could be a dangerous 9, 10, 11 seed type team.
    9-11 seed works out to somewhere from 33-44 in the rankings. I'd bet the farm that the Zags finish at better than 32.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    11,992

    Default

    The talent is there although not “Rui-Clarke” talent . We’ll have to see what happens after the OOC component. If Few finds a seasoned PG, were a top 10 team.’ Our top 4 scorers are gone . That can’t look good!! Soldier on fellas!

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    11,578

    Default

    I see I'm in the minority opinion once again. It's been a long time, and it feels good.

    Go Zags!!!
    Go Zags!!! The Best Is Yet To Come!!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •