Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789
Results 201 to 209 of 209

Thread: 2021 - Chet Holmgren

  1. #201
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    San Diego, Ca.
    Posts
    7,558

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by caldwellzag View Post
    I didn't answer the question as I know it is not in the plans moving forward so why play the what if game. No his offer is for 2021 and that's where the staff sees him fit. And my takes come not from what I saw, but from information and conversations I have with those that know a lot more than we do.
    It feels like Chet is the next shoe to drop in Gonzaga recruiting. The bond he has with Suggs sure seems big.

  2. #202
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    Denver, Colorado
    Posts
    397

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by caldwellzag View Post
    I didn't answer the question as I know it is not in the plans moving forward so why play the what if game. No his offer is for 2021 and that's where the staff sees him fit. And my takes come not from what I saw, but from information and conversations I have with those that know a lot more than we do.
    Fair enough. I think its a interesting hypothetical because as you stated " I am going to say point blank it is not all Chet's decision, Gonzaga has a large say in it." With most recruits I would be inclined to agree but with Chet if he really got it in his head he wanted to reclassify, I doubt Gonzaga would have much choice in the matter unless they wanted to lose him. Additionally, with the space available for next year I'm sure the staff wouldn't mind having him a year early.

  3. #203
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Twin Cities
    Posts
    3,542

    Default

    Tall and extremely lanky ectomorph body types never truly gain/put on a ton of weight or muscle. They can get stronger, add joint muscle, yet their long bones are so disproportionate they never truly bulk up.

    Chet is an intriguing prospect. We know how skilled he is, esp given his size. An elite level shot blocker/alterer, great length, above average handles, smart player.

    He is 6'11"-7'0", 175lbs.

    His older profiles lists him as 190lbs, which isnt up to date nor accurate.

    He makes Austin Daye and Manut Bol look swol.

    Not necessarily a bad thing, just intriguing is all.

    A D1 Center cant be 175lbs. Even Tillie is on the lighter/skinny side.

    I wonder if you have Chet as a uber tall, lengthy, rangy small forward. Not asked to "bang", can dribble, solid shooter, good feel, westside help D to block shots, use length to guard smaller forwards/guards, etc.

    I think you almost have to. Yes, you can occasionally float your center to the perimeter like we do with Tillie and even Wiltjer, yet they still must defend, bang, battle for boards on occasion.

    Chet will add 10, maybe 15lbs in college, just his unique body type.

    I will be curious his position at next level and beyond...

  4. #204
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    San Diego, Ca.
    Posts
    7,558

    Default

    I remember Malik Pope was a tall drink of water. He had some injury issues along to way. To my knowledge Chet Holmgren has been injury free. I hope he picks GU for 2021.

  5. #205
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    224

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by caldwellzag View Post
    We are all entitled to our opinion, when reading your post you stated the decision is Chet's and I am going to say point blank it is not all Chet's decision, Gonzaga has a large say in it. Chet got moved off his spot all night by Dainja, he stood on the perimeter most the night. Not a negative, but he must fill out to get meaningful minutes a year early at a top ranked D1 school. Look at our bigs who play everyone that has played as a freshman is 30-40 lbs larger than Chet. He weighs 180!!! Chet is a talent, but if he reclassifies it will be due to a commitment and an honest conversation with Tommy and Mark about if we need/want him to reclassify. Paolo would make more sense to reclassify as he has the body, but he has stated he does not plan on it.
    This⬆️
    Although I was rooting for his TD he barely missed on pts he clearly does not have the physicality yet. Most of his blocks were in help situations. Paolo already looks like Watson whereas I can’t imagine Holmgren banging with Ballo, Timme, and Zakharov. Usually the points are the easiest part of a TD but Chet had an easier time with RB and blocks. To me that is bc as Caldwell mentioned he was frequently moved off of his spots.

  6. #206
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    483

    Default

    We have plenty of bangers in Ballo, TImme, and BIg Z. I see him as more of a 4, like KG or Durant. Can't get moved off his spot if his spot starts out at the 3 pt line. His true value won't be on O at 1st, it will be his helpside D which we are severely lacking right now. Hopefully Ballo will be the answer for next year, but if not, and we lose Petro, we have a glaring weakness in the middle of our D.

  7. #207
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Napa, CA
    Posts
    4,448

    Default

    It seems pretty clear to me that he's not a center, and not even a traditional power forward. A stretch-4 at most. Tons of talent, but we wouldn't want to pigeonhole him into something that he isn't.
    I will thank God for the day and the moment I have. - Jimmy V

  8. #208
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    372

    Default

    I recall there was mention that he didnt view himself as a center and wanted to consider programs that would provide an opportunity to showcase his talents outside the key.

  9. #209
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,766

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by webspinnre View Post
    It seems pretty clear to me that he's not a center, and not even a traditional power forward. A stretch-4 at most. Tons of talent, but we wouldn't want to pigeonhole him into something that he isn't.
    He looks like Kristaps Porzingas (body wise) when he was drafted by the NBA. He will grow into his body over time but the skill set is there to be great which will only continue to develop. As talented as Chet is, he could possibly be a 2 year guy in college from a physical development point of view.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •