Originally posted by seacatfan
View Post
Poll: Should Larsen start at center and JWIII come off the bench?
Collapse
X
-
Unless my memory is off, Larsen kind of reminds me of Batista. JP was 2 inches shorter & 40lbs heavier, but the stats seem similar.
Larsen so far (age 20):
12min, 5.1pts, 4.1rb, 2P% .619, FT% .750
Batista year 1 (age 23):
25 min, 12.4pts, 6.2rb, 2P% .612, FT% .802
Batista year 2:
32 min, 19.3pts, 9.4rb, 2P% .594, FT% .833
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by scrooner View PostUnless my memory is off, Larsen kind of reminds me of Batista. JP was 2 inches shorter & 40lbs heavier, but the stats seem similar.
Larsen so far (age 20):
12min, 5.1pts, 4.1rb, 2P% .619, FT% .750
Batista year 1 (age 23):
25 min, 12.4pts, 6.2rb, 2P% .612, FT% .802
Batista year 2:
32 min, 19.3pts, 9.4rb, 2P% .594, FT% .833
Comment
-
-
Not a crazy question. JW thrived as a pf last year, much more natural position and as pro likely where he'd earn a living. I'd love to see JL at the 5 and JW at the 4. But that leaves Tillie off the floor and I think he's our most consistent player. I think this is our last year to watch "the Eiffel tower" in a zag uniform. To valuable not to start.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by thespywhozaggedme View PostNo, I'm talking about the guy that had 5 points, 5 fouls and ZERO rebounds tonight. See, I can cherry pick stats that fit my narrative too. lol
I just referenced 5 games. You referenced 1.
Going too fast for you?
I'll see your lol & raise you LOL.But we don't play nobody.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by sittingon50 View PostCherry pick stats?
I just referenced 5 games. You referenced 1.
Going too fast for you?
I'll see your lol & raise you LOL.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by thespywhozaggedme View PostI could post similar games where he was less than effective, i.e. Utah state but I did not want this to be a JW III bashing thread but conversely I didn't want posts like yours turning it into a slobber fest either.But we don't play nobody.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cggonzaga View PostI’ll stick with our leading scorer and rebounder. Sheesh, guy has one bad game and you’re ready to move on? Come on spy!
5 points, 0 rebounds, 3 turnovers, 5 personal fouls, offensive rating of 65 (the Will Foster line - kind of like the Mendoza Line - is 95 for comparison).
15 points, 5 rebounds, 4 turnovers, Offensive Rating of 81
9 points, 7 rebounds (efficient game with 122 O-Rating against Incarnate Word)
10 points, 4 rebounds, 6 turnovers, 4 fouls, O-Rating of 57
Throw in 5 points and 5 rebounds against Utah State (and 4 fouls) and what you have is:
An offensive efficiency rating of 101.3 for the season. Good enough for 10th on the team. (Jack Beach is worse)
A true shot percentage of 55.6, 9th on the team (Jesse Wade and Jack Beach are worse)
He's had 2 offensive rebounds in the last three games, dropping him from a solid number to 8.7% (Larsen at 14.9 and Hachimura at 10.3).
He fifth in defensive rebounding percentage.
He is 8th on our team in FT%. (Better than Wade, Jones and Beach)
7th in 2PFG% (Better than Perkins, Melson, and Beach)
He is 9th in 3FG% (Better than Beach)
He is behind Tillie (4.7%) and Larsen (6.5%) in blocked shots (3.4%).
Basically, he has been a high usage player with incredibly inefficient statistics. This is consistent with what he did when Missouri asked him to be THE GUY. O-Rating as a freshman was 105.8 with a usage rate of 13.9%. As a sophomore, his O-Rating dipped to 90.4 with a usage rate of 25.2. He is currently at 101.3 with a usage rate of 24.1 after being a solid 115 O-rating with a usage rate of 18.9.
Even though possession based metrics show him to be considerably worse than Larsen, I think part of the reason is we are trying to make him something he is not. He is not a premier go-to guy. He is an excellent secondary or third option. He was fantastic last year playing off of other playmakers, but like his sophomore season, he is struggling to be the playmaker. I'd love to see his usage dip from 24.1 to 19% or so. Play through Tillie and Larsen more (with him on the court with Larsen) to get him some weak-side rebounding and scoring opportunities to get him going.
It's possible that he'll flip the switch (especially during WCC play) and become something he has never been, but it is also possible that getting him a few easier looks as the offense is run through one of the other bigs would be good for him and developing the other player.
For the record, Reborn does not approve of this message or endorse it in any way.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ZagzKrak View PostJW3 is not really a center...I'd like to see JL and JW3 start and have Tillie come off the bench with the first foul maybe. But either way JW3 earned his right to start last year IMHO.
imho, JWIII is trying too hard and not letting the game come to him + Zags are feeding into that by forcing him to be a “post up down on the block and go to work” type player...that was good for Karnowski but not for JWIII. It’s his senior season, he aspires to play professionally and it’s as if the pressure to perform and earn an opportunity to do so is already on his mind. Just ball out and enjoy your senior year JWIII...ZagNation loves you already.Even though I care a lot about my basketball opinions, they are like comparing a bicycle to a championship motorcycle who is our coach. . ZagsGoZags
Comment
-
Comment