Page 17 of 17 FirstFirst ... 71314151617
Results 401 to 414 of 414

Thread: General Science Thread

  1. #401
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    17,040

    Default

    Ha! Nice, Will.

    I forgot to mention, on the LIGO point. When the two black holes collapsed into each other, they released 3 solar masses, 3 suns, into the cosmos in one instant, as pure energy.

    if you have E=MC2, and "M" is 3 solar masses, getting multiplied by the speed of light, squared

    You're left with the energy our sun has used or ever could use in its lifetime, times 3, in one instant, it is so much energy that in that one instant, the black-hole collapse released more energy than everywhere else in the visible universe combined.
    Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
    Mark Twain.

  2. #402
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    17,040

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Markburn1 View Post
    I’m about halfway through.

    I don’t think they know where that electron is. Sounds like measuring differs in alternate universes. And the “Super Position might be any number of positions or no position at all. Fascinating.

    The philosophy and political aspects they speak of was a big surprise to me. I am astonished that scientists allow their fear of rejection get in the way of what they believe to be correct. How many advancements in understanding how the world works were thwarted because someone was afraid to upset Bohr. Or someone else.

    Will finish the discussion tomorrow evening.
    It's an honor to hear you'd listen on just a recommendation from me. Listening to a 90 minute conversation between these 2 guys - top of their fields - is fascinating IMO, and they're both kinda cool dudes, not nerdy, and good teachers.


    Here is a link to a more contemporary article the examines where things stand now on the collapse of the wave function, and the interaction with consciousness. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com...about-reality/


    One thing we can be sure of, both physicists and philosophers are well-aware of the implications if it truly is that consciousness itself alters reality.

    Werner Heisenberg, among others, interpreted the mathematics to mean that reality doesn’t exist until observed. “The idea of an objective real world whose smallest parts exist objectively in the same sense as stones or trees exist, independently of whether or not we observe them ... is impossible,” he wrote. John Wheeler, too, used a variant of the double-slit experiment to argue that “no elementary quantum phenomenon is a phenomenon until it is a registered (‘observed,’ ‘indelibly recorded’) phenomenon.”

    BUT:


    But these experiments don’t constitute empirical evidence for such claims. In the double-slit experiment done with single photons, all one can do is verify the probabilistic predictions of the mathematics. If the probabilities are borne out over the course of sending tens of thousands of identical photons through the double slit, the theory claims that each photon’s wave function collapsed—thanks to an ill-defined process called measurement. That’s all
    Pretty big stakes. And as you noted, in that discussion, how the politics of this interpretation played out was fascinating, it scares just as many people as it does excite, if reality truly isn't "real" until a person sees it. Some physicists are excited about the more "Human-centered" view, some are repelled by it, the reductionists. Oh, and the leader of the reductionists was that scientist Einstein, so it's tough to write them off.
    Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
    Mark Twain.

  3. #403
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    17,040

    Default

    I haven't had time to watch it yet, but this is supposed to be a good 17 minute video on the making of the image: "In the Shadow of a Black Hole"

    Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
    Mark Twain.

  4. #404
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DixieZag View Post
    It's an honor to hear you'd listen on just a recommendation from me. Listening to a 90 minute conversation between these 2 guys - top of their fields - is fascinating IMO, and they're both kinda cool dudes, not nerdy, and good teachers.


    Here is a link to a more contemporary article the examines where things stand now on the collapse of the wave function, and the interaction with consciousness. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com...about-reality/


    One thing we can be sure of, both physicists and philosophers are well-aware of the implications if it truly is that consciousness itself alters reality.




    BUT:




    Pretty big stakes. And as you noted, in that discussion, how the politics of this interpretation played out was fascinating, it scares just as many people as it does excite, if reality truly isn't "real" until a person sees it. Some physicists are excited about the more "Human-centered" view, some are repelled by it, the reductionists. Oh, and the leader of the reductionists was that scientist Einstein, so it's tough to write them off.
    Forgive me for being simplistic, but isn't this question encapsulated in the age old "Does a falling tree make a sound in the woods if there is nobody there to hear it"?

    I admit I'm having trouble with getting my mind around the "super position" theory that allows for photons, electrons, etc. to be in two places at once. The photon thing is especially weird when they describe it as going through two slits at once and creating turbulent waves on the other side that either produce bright bands or darkness depending on the intersection of crests and troughs, all the while being the same photon.

    As for listening to your podcast recommendation, I am a curious sort. I wouldn't have except I value your judgement and that started on the basketball threads. When I found this thread, I read through the entire thing from beginning to where we are now and found a non judgmental approach to a subject that needlessly scares some folks. I hope more people participate here. There is something for everyone in this conversation.

  5. #405
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    774

    Default

    So, here's something that's amusing to me.

    God is going through all the mathematical equations. Considering photons, waves, electrons, etc. Decides it's time to put it in practice. "Let there be light". Creates heaven and earth and all that goes with it. Reaches the sixth day and says to himself, "All this stuff is really cool but if I don't put a creature on earth with the capability of seeing it and reasoning what it means, reality will be limited to Me. I'm the only one that knows the answers to trees falling in the woods". So, he creates humanity and the quest for meaning follows.

    Kinda shows how my pea brain works. Haha


    I believe in the Catholic church. I also believe the Church has stifled scientific inquiry for a long time. The Church is just now coming around to opening hearts and minds to the incredible scientific complexity of our world. Just as the two scientists described the political suppression of scientific views, the Church wittingly or unwittingly did the same. Not so much anymore.


    I recently read a book entitled "Would You Baptize an Extraterrestial?" It's written by a couple of Jesuit scientists that are affiliated with the Vatican Observatory. It's fairly light reading but poses some interesting questions.

  6. #406
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    17,040

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Markburn1 View Post
    So, here's something that's amusing to me.

    God is going through all the mathematical equations. Considering photons, waves, electrons, etc. Decides it's time to put it in practice. "Let there be light". Creates heaven and earth and all that goes with it. Reaches the sixth day and says to himself, "All this stuff is really cool but if I don't put a creature on earth with the capability of seeing it and reasoning what it means, reality will be limited to Me. I'm the only one that knows the answers to trees falling in the woods". So, he creates humanity and the quest for meaning follows.

    Kinda shows how my pea brain works. Haha


    I believe in the Catholic church. I also believe the Church has stifled scientific inquiry for a long time. The Church is just now coming around to opening hearts and minds to the incredible scientific complexity of our world. Just as the two scientists described the political suppression of scientific views, the Church wittingly or unwittingly did the same. Not so much anymore.


    I recently read a book entitled "Would You Baptize an Extraterrestial?" It's written by a couple of Jesuit scientists that are affiliated with the Vatican Observatory. It's fairly light reading but poses some interesting questions.
    Thanks for the nice words about the thread, it is my favorite but lots of people contribute to it.

    As for having a hard time wrapping the mind around quantum mechanics, famous physicist Richard Fynman once said "If you think you understand Quantum Mechanics, you don't understand it." (Or something to that effect.)

    It is interesting, if one reads the Genesis description, it follows awfully close to how things evolved from the Big Bang.
    Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
    Mark Twain.

  7. #407
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    17,040

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DixieZag View Post
    I haven't had time to watch it yet, but this is supposed to be a good 17 minute video on the making of the image: "In the Shadow of a Black Hole"



    By the way, one of the things that I missed in all the reporting, the reason they chose THIS black hole in that other galaxy, is that this one makes the massive one in the center of our solar system look puny.

    The black hole in the center of our galaxy is 4 million solar masses, the one in the picture is 6.5 BILLION solar masses. I told my daughter: "It is like 6.5 billion suns, stuffed into the size smaller than the dot on this "I" and she got this dazed look in her eyes.
    Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
    Mark Twain.

  8. #408
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    17,040

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Markburn1 View Post
    So, here's something that's amusing to me.

    God is going through all the mathematical equations. Considering photons, waves, electrons, etc. Decides it's time to put it in practice. "Let there be light". Creates heaven and earth and all that goes with it. Reaches the sixth day and says to himself, "All this stuff is really cool but if I don't put a creature on earth with the capability of seeing it and reasoning what it means, reality will be limited to Me. I'm the only one that knows the answers to trees falling in the woods". So, he creates humanity and the quest for meaning follows.

    Kinda shows how my pea brain works. Haha


    I believe in the Catholic church. I also believe the Church has stifled scientific inquiry for a long time. The Church is just now coming around to opening hearts and minds to the incredible scientific complexity of our world. Just as the two scientists described the political suppression of scientific views, the Church wittingly or unwittingly did the same. Not so much anymore.


    I recently read a book entitled "Would You Baptize an Extraterrestial?" It's written by a couple of Jesuit scientists that are affiliated with the Vatican Observatory. It's fairly light reading but poses some interesting questions.
    I found the quote, by one of the greatest physicists of his era, Feynman:

    "If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics.


    https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:Richard_Feynman
    Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
    Mark Twain.

  9. #409
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Greater Tacoma
    Posts
    5,338

    Default

    Giant Stratolaunch aircraft lifts off from California

    https://www.seattletimes.com/busines...om-california/
    .
    .
    .
    "thnk god for few" jazzdelmar(12/12/11 12:50pm)
    .
    "When most of us couldn't buy a basket. Where do we get off anyway?!" siliconzag (11/17/06 5:45:41 pm)
    .
    I am monitoring the price of a donut
    .

  10. #410
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    17,040

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rangerzag View Post
    Giant Stratolaunch aircraft lifts off from California

    https://www.seattletimes.com/busines...om-california/
    Cool article.

    I had thought it had flown already.

    6 747 engines, wow.
    Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
    Mark Twain.

  11. #411
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,302

    Default

    Was your area okay with all the tornados, Dixie?

  12. #412
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    17,040

    Default

    Yes, but just 30 miles north of us got nailed badly.

    I hate tornadoes.

    I actually slept right through the big stuff.
    Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
    Mark Twain.

  13. #413
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,302

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DixieZag View Post
    Yes, but just 30 miles north of us got nailed badly.

    I hate tornadoes.

    I actually slept right through the big stuff.
    Glad to hear your town was okay, very scary how close it was thought!

  14. #414
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    17,040

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jazzgirl_127 View Post
    Glad to hear your town was okay, very scary how close it was thought!
    Yes, I drove to the store Sunday morning - to get provisions for the Masters, and there were branches all over the roads, it was very windy, that's for sure, and then very cold yesterday, didn't get above 60.

    Good day to stay in and watch TV all morning.

    Meteor showers dig up water on the moon


    Can't post pics on this new computer, not sure why: https://www.sciencenews.org/article/...ater-moon-nasa

    Meteor showers bring moon geysers. A lunar orbiter spotted extra water around the moon when the moon passed through streams of cosmic dust that can cause meteor showers on Earth.

    The water was probably released from lunar soil by tiny meteorite impacts, planetary scientist Mehdi Benna of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., and colleagues report April 15 in in Nature Geoscience. Those random impacts suggest water is buried all over the moon, rather than isolated in freezing dark craters — and that the moon has been wet for billions of years.
    Samples of lunar soil brought back by the Apollo astronauts suggested that the moon is bone dry. But in the last decade or so, several remote missions have found water deposits on the moon, including signs of frozen surface water in regions of permanent shadow near the poles (SN: 10/24/09, p. 10).
    Very cool short video on meteorites hitting the moon, 4 minutes.

    Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
    Mark Twain.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •