Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 41

Thread: Am I the Only One?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Columbia, MO
    Posts
    592

    Default Am I the Only One?

    I know, I know...call me paranoid. But am I the only one who is always a little worried, in the back of my mind, that this run of amazing success at GU is tenuous?

    I mean, a couple of bad years or some NCAA violation, and is it possible that we start slipping and, waaaay down the road, the clock strikes midnight and we go back to being San Diego or Santa Clara? Or maybe Coach Few leaves in 15 years and make a mistake hiring his replacement and poof — there it goes?

    I know it sounds ridiculous, but there's just no way we're good every year for the rest of eternity.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    17,250 miles East of Spokane
    Posts
    17,793

    Default

    I use to feel that way 10-12 years ago. Figured it was inevitable that UW would overtake Gonzaga, get all the good recruits and the Zags would settle back into their niche like every mid major before and after has done.

    But not anymore. A generation of results is a pretty good indicator.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    9,397

    Default

    Yes. It's a hard climb but the fall is easy. Take nothing for granted and enjoy the run.
    Qualified for 22 Straight Big Dances

    11 Straight Round of 32s

    10 Sweet Sixteens (5 Straight)

    4 Elite Eights

    2017 FINAL FOUR

    2 Winningest Players in college basketball history (Karnowski 137, Perkins 134)

    The Best Point Guard to ever play the game: John Stockton, most assists, most steals.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,522

    Default

    A conversation best had in 25 years when Mark Few retires.
    Krozman
    GU student 1996-2000
    Law Student 2000-2003

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Columbia, MO
    Posts
    592

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gonzagafan62 View Post
    Yes. It's a hard climb but the fall is easy. Take nothing for granted and enjoy the run.
    The follow-up question is, let's say, god forbid, something terrible happens and in 25 years, we're back to pre-1999 Gonzaga. Going 5-13 or whatever in the WCC. Make the NCAA Tourney once in a blue moon. Do we — and if so, how — maintain our fandom? That would be SOOOO soul-crushing, wouldn't it?

    (Not saying this will happen because we're pretty darn well-established now, but I want to at least acknowledge and be prepared for the possibility.)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    9,397

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thegloriousgoateeofKP View Post
    The follow-up question is, let's say, god forbid, something terrible happens and in 25 years, we're back to pre-1999 Gonzaga. Going 5-13 or whatever in the WCC. Make the NCAA Tourney once in a blue moon. Do we — and if so, how — maintain our fandom? That would be SOOOO soul-crushing, wouldn't it?

    (Not saying this will happen because we're pretty darn well-established now, but I want to at least acknowledge and be prepared for the possibility.)
    I've been wearing these hoodies, hats, jackets, sweatshirts, tshirts, underpants and so on for 10 years. Have a wedding ring with a zag bulldog on it. When I say for life I mean it. I don't care if we go 0-30 and have no wins and no TV games. Gonzaga is life.

    I do hereby declare however that I'm a bit exhausting. When it comes to my fandom of Gonzaga. Everyone in town knows I'm a zag fan. I'm a bit crazy passionate about sports! A little? PS3 maybe that's crazy for saying that
    Qualified for 22 Straight Big Dances

    11 Straight Round of 32s

    10 Sweet Sixteens (5 Straight)

    4 Elite Eights

    2017 FINAL FOUR

    2 Winningest Players in college basketball history (Karnowski 137, Perkins 134)

    The Best Point Guard to ever play the game: John Stockton, most assists, most steals.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,046

    Default

    My single biggest worry is if Tommy Lloyd was to leave. He's clearly our best recruiter and the players love him. It would be a huge loss imo.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    10,183

    Default

    I guess nothing lasts forever, but there's no end in sight for the Zags currently. Xavier doesn't have as long as a consecutive NCAA Tourney streak as GU does, but they've been consistently good for something around the last 25-30 years. A bunch of different coaches during that time frame. GU may very well continue to be a strong program once Few decides to retire.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Columbia, MO
    Posts
    592

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seacatfan View Post
    I guess nothing lasts forever, but there's no end in sight for the Zags currently. Xavier doesn't have as long as a consecutive NCAA Tourney streak as GU does, but they've been consistently good for something around the last 25-30 years. A bunch of different coaches during that time frame. GU may very well continue to be a strong program once Few decides to retire.
    Xavier's a good example but they're now in the Big East. I feel like everyone in the big conferences at least get SOME whiff of success every now and then (Oregon St., for example). It's cyclical. But the dregs of the WCC/smaller conferences simply never do.

    This is the strongest argument for moving conferences, IMO. When you're in the WCC, you're at risk (no matter how small) of complete irrelevance.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    9,397

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thegloriousgoateeofKP View Post
    Xavier's a good example but they're now in the Big East. I feel like everyone in the big conferences at least get SOME whiff of success every now and then (Oregon St., for example). It's cyclical. But the dregs of the WCC/smaller conferences simply never do.

    This is the strongest argument for moving conferences, IMO. When you're in the WCC, you're at risk (no matter how small) of complete irrelevance.
    Northwestern has never been in or played an NCAA tournament game. On that note, I feel confident in saying: I'm glad we've had the run we've had over the last 20 years.
    Qualified for 22 Straight Big Dances

    11 Straight Round of 32s

    10 Sweet Sixteens (5 Straight)

    4 Elite Eights

    2017 FINAL FOUR

    2 Winningest Players in college basketball history (Karnowski 137, Perkins 134)

    The Best Point Guard to ever play the game: John Stockton, most assists, most steals.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Columbia, MO
    Posts
    592

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gonzagafan62 View Post
    Northwestern has never been in or played an NCAA tournament game. On that note, I feel confident in saying: I'm glad we've had the run we've had over the last 20 years.
    True. But let's say college basketball goes on for another 1,000 years. I'm pretty confident saying Northwestern wins at least one championship. EVENTUALLY they'll stumble upon a stretch of 10 great years or something and get it done. San Diego? Weber St.? Hampton? Coppin St.? Hard to see them.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    945

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thegloriousgoateeofKP View Post
    The follow-up question is, let's say, god forbid, something terrible happens and in 25 years, we're back to pre-1999 Gonzaga. Going 5-13 or whatever in the WCC. Make the NCAA Tourney once in a blue moon. Do we — and if so, how — maintain our fandom? That would be SOOOO soul-crushing, wouldn't it?

    (Not saying this will happen because we're pretty darn well-established now, but I want to at least acknowledge and be prepared for the possibility.)
    Interesting discussion. However, you do realize there are a significant number of posters that likely will have passed beyond this earth in 25 years. How about we revise the discussion to a more realistic (for some of us) time span of, say, 10-11 years

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    12,535

    Default

    People used to say that even after the E 8 and two swt sixteens that followed it. I quit worrying. This past year was easily the scariest.......all year long. Guard play up and own and I always worried about injuries. Plus we really were lucky to pull out the tournament to even get to the NCAA. Few felt the same way. This year, again, was the worst in this regard. I know we'll be fine for the next several years unless a catostrophic event happens. SO no, I don't think about us going to the level of San Diego or Santa Clara............it just won't happen. We're lucky to have a young core of coaches.
    I also worry about Tommy going elsewhere.Hope he keeps getting great raises. There will come a day that money won't matter to stay. He'll move on. Sad that day will happen. If you knew Tommy, he's just a nicest guy...smart, dedicated with an obvious eye for talent.....and he works his *ss off to get it here.
    Last edited by MDABE80; 04-03-2016 at 10:26 PM.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    7,163

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thegloriousgoateeofKP View Post
    The follow-up question is, let's say, god forbid, something terrible happens and in 25 years, we're back to pre-1999 Gonzaga. Going 5-13 or whatever in the WCC. Make the NCAA Tourney once in a blue moon. Do we — and if so, how — maintain our fandom? That would be SOOOO soul-crushing, wouldn't it?

    (Not saying this will happen because we're pretty darn well-established now, but I want to at least acknowledge and be prepared for the possibility.)
    In 25 years I'll be 92 and probably senile. Pretty sure I'll still be a Zag fan, even if I don't know who or what they are!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Tacoma, WA
    Posts
    1,353

    Default

    The streak of consecutive appearances in the NCAA will come to an end eventually.. it's just bound to happen. However, I really don't see GU fading back to "irrelevant". The reputation of this program and success they have achieved should generate good recruits and good opponents until there is a legnthy fall from "elite" status. I just don't see the team and program failing to compete in that manner. Injuries, bad luck, bad assessment of incoming talent are all factors but it would take a prolonged combination of some or all of these factors to derail Gonzaga.

    Just my two cents.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Columbia, MO
    Posts
    592

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zag_Dad View Post
    The streak of consecutive appearances in the NCAA will come to an end eventually.. it's just bound to happen. However, I really don't see GU fading back to "irrelevant". The reputation of this program and success they have achieved should generate good recruits and good opponents until there is a legnthy fall from "elite" status. I just don't see the team and program failing to compete in that manner. Injuries, bad luck, bad assessment of incoming talent are all factors but it would take a prolonged combination of some or all of these factors to derail Gonzaga.

    Just my two cents.
    And two very rational, well reasoned cents at that.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    849

    Default

    As fans, we sometimes forget what a freaky force of nature this Zag run has been. That a little school in eastern washington can achieve and maintain this level of success is nothing short of incredible. Now GU is a destination school for high level transfers and top high school recruits - all the while maintaining Tommy's unbelievable world-wide recruiting success - and looks to be continually growing in momentum, which should lead to better success in the tourney including a final four or NC. This was a year when the zags had heavy blows (lose Pangos and Bell and then Karno for the year) and presented situation where the program would likely miss the tourney. Next thing you know, the boys pull it together and have a sweet-16 (nearly EE) run... what an amazing platform for success that Few has created.

    If Sabonis and Karno leave along with Wiltjer -- those losses would cripple most programs. GU will probably be a top 20 team even if all of them leave. That is a testament to what a program Few and co. have built.

    That said, nothing lasts forever. Although the Zags are loaded for next year and the foreseeable future, things can change pretty quick. I say enjoy it while we have it and maintain the fan base in the inevitable down times.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    758

    Default

    I always wondered that seeing LMU fans circa Hank Gathers still coming to the WCC tournament looking around like "y'all just don't know the pain." I'm an optimist though. I feel like there are enough loyal boosters built in the last 20 years that they won't sit still for more than 4-5 years of NIT appearances. Tommy Lloyd looks like he's getting groomed up well, and athletic department is healthy money-wise. I'm feeling ok about our future.
    Quote Originally Posted by Reborn View Post
    Go Zags!!!

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    18,359

    Default

    No one has touched on it directly but another big aspect to sustaining elite level ball, not falling to back to pre-1999, is money. I no longer worry about it with the current coaching staff. Even this year, when it looked like we'd miss the tournament, we had red-shirts and recruits that looked to lock in another run next year.

    But, even if we had a couple down years, even if Few were to leave, or Tommy left, the Athletic Department (and the administration) now has the money to invest to do what it takes to get back to that level. Invest in getting the people who can get it done, invest in the students maintaining the excitement and I don't see going back to permanent mediocrity.

    Money cannot guarantee elite level basketball, but it can be a big stopgap to any slide.
    Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
    Mark Twain.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    758

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DixieZag View Post
    No one has touched on it directly but another big aspect to sustaining elite level ball, not falling to back to pre-1999, is money. I no longer worry about it with the current coaching staff. Even this year, when it looked like we'd miss the tournament, we had red-shirts and recruits that looked to lock in another run next year.

    But, even if we had a couple down years, even if Few were to leave, or Tommy left, the Athletic Department (and the administration) now has the money to invest to do what it takes to get back to that level. Invest in getting the people who can get it done, invest in the students maintaining the excitement and I don't see going back to permanent mediocrity.
    See my post directly before yours. I agree it is critical. But we have some boosters that have started to show endurance, and maybe a bit of the same insecurities we're expressing here. Last years E8 generated another big contribution.
    Quote Originally Posted by Reborn View Post
    Go Zags!!!

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    12,264

    Default

    Something else to consider is student enrollment. Gonzaga has spent a lot of money to build new buildings to meet the needs of the increased enrollment size that has happened in the last ten - fifteen years. Gonzaga is not the same campus as it was when I graduated in '70. To maintain that upward trend in increased student enrollment, the administration at GU will have to keep the basketball program at it's current level. And after Few and Tommy leave, and that's a long time from now, the administration will need to pay for a top notch coach. I hope to live long enough to see who that would be. He's going to have to b someone very special, like Mark Few. So do I think it will happen. NO!!!

    Go Zags!!!
    Go Zags!!! The Best Is Yet To Come!!!

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,028

    Default

    I love this kind of macro topic, so here's my somewhat removed-from-the-minutiae, stream of consciousness take...

    i agree with the premise that GU's success is tenuous. to a degree, all programs that are high-achieving are doing so on a thin line. even the true elites can fall for a short term, but they can much more easily bounce back. that's what this is all about for me, how would GU bounce back from a slip? well, that's the first part. the second part is: how do they keep up what they've done?

    to start, i think you need to assess the higher level factors that could become headwinds, and are more or less inherent to the program. also, this is assuming that gonzaga has already fallen some and needs to rebound. As long as they stay on current trend, these factors are not huge killers, though still not ideal.

    for gu, i'd say these are the key risks that you could file as "external factors:"

    Spokane: as much as many on here love spokane, it's not going to help gonzaga in the case of slippage, for a couple reasons. first, there is not enough local talent in spokane and surrounding area to recruit a highly competitive team (or even core) locally, and over the long term. how many GSL kids per year, or decade, go on to become big name college bball players? very few. so you have to bring kids in. to that end, it's not overly appealing to the general public that doesnt have a familiarity with the city and area. it's very remote and cold in season. not a destination city for the 18 year old bball star that travels around the country playing in tournaments in all sorts of glamorous locales. even for kids from seattle, its a tougher sell than many, many places in the US. you can even extend GU/Spokane's "local" recruiting territory east through Montana if you'd like, since there is no real local competition for those kids.

    Conference: very similar to Spokane, the WCC isnt attracting the kids you need to rebuild from any slip to mediocrity. its not a destination conference, doesn't have glamorous dates on the sched (nice cities, sure, but not big name opponents). i dont see this changing. even if the other teams improve some, there is a very real ceiling. to get to the point where high level kids grow up wanting to play in the WCC feels borderline impossible. if you dont believe this, look at the kids the OTHER wcc teams are bringing in. again, all of this is about a situation where GU needs to climb back (which is seemingly inevitable at some point)

    Prestige/Elite"ness": I only bring this one up because someone else mentioned it earlier as something GU could re-build off of should a rebuilding day come (and i disagree with it in that context)... I know this one will be controversial, but should GU fall without getting multiple f4s and maybe a title, the enduring legacy will get washed away with many other programs that have had nice little runs - even if they pale in comparison to what GU has done. Might seem unfair, but you don't build the kind of legacy that attracts 4/5 star kids by going to a handful of s16s and a few e8s. those are great in the moment, but certainly have shelf lives. we've all seen the highlights in some posters signatures, but here's some context behind the 7 s16s and 2 e8s... since 1999, 272 s16 appearances have been earned, 136 to the elite 8, and 68 for the f4. granted that only one per year is available to any given team, but this frames up just how many of these accomplishments have been spread out (albeit very unevenly) across the landscape. for further final four context, since 1999, 32 different teams have gone to the final four. 32. 16 of them have gone more than once. to be even close to elite, i think you'd have to be in that second group of multiple f4 appearance teams.

    again, this is all from the angle that GU has to climb the mtn again. i think kids NOW are largely signing up for the CURRENT success. if that goes away, i dont think prestige is cashing the checks. thats just me though

    the first two are the big ones to me. the ones that you cant really change.

    but GU has been fine on that front for almost 2 decades now, so why can't they continue to stay on track? more to the point, WHAT will cause them to fall?

    this begs the question of how GU has stayed where they are for so long... and how risky is that proposition? can they stay on their model for the indefinite future?

    So here's how i see Gonzaga's last 15+ years, and how they've stayed so consistent: i also assess a risk to continuing these success factors

    Coaching continuity & consistency: say what you want about mark few (that preface would be more directed towards his detractors, obviously), but he really knows how to build a balanced team, both 1-5 and fr-sr, that for the most part looks the same year after year. he also beats the teams they should beat with an INCREDIBLE regularity. His total win pct is absolutely incredible when you back it up against his % against the top 25 (think that's in the low-mid 20s). If his teams had the propensity to drop games to teams they shouldnt, like most teams do, there are some NIT years mixed in there because lets face it, the record against the true top of CBB really isnt all that good. mix in some NIT years, and maybe the allure isnt there for a couple key kids along the way, and maybe they lose the momentum? who knows. what i do know is that the consistency has been amazing. as long as Few is around, i'd say risk of losing this positive attribute is low. no reason to believe he doesnt keep doing what he's doing on this front

    "non-traditional" recruiting: most high end teams are built mostly through getting US (really should say north american) HS stars to sign up right out of HS. GU hasnt really done this at a level that coincides with their on-court success, but has really supplemented the HS pipeline with some high quality transfers and foreign players. so many of these guys like batista (my all time favorite), turiaf, some of the early australians, karnowski, sabonis, and more were incredibly important to continuity of success. if ANY of these guys didnt pan out in spades, their teams would have struggled significantly. im sure there are some that didnt pan out, but the success rate in this recruiting channel has to be at or near the top of college bball. the same can be said for high level transfers. knight, dickau, wiltjer, etc. international guys and transfers flop ALL THE TIME. but not at GU. at GU, they've been consistent cornerstones. this is a huge risk to me. if the international well dries up (seems to hinge on one coach), or they miss on some xfers that REALLY need to pan out (one next yr comes to mind), it could be problematic. overall depth of talent is great for WCC, but not for the peer group GU wants to associate with... these non-traditional guys need to keep panning out.

    There's a lot more to the success, but the two above i think have been very vital. i think consistency can last as long as few is around, and the aspect of roster building is just always going to be risky (but also always has been, and its worked). once one of those pillars falls, i think GU could be in trouble of losing footing in its current tier. from there, they're fighting location and conference to get back to where they are today. they could do it, but it would take catching lightning in a bottle AGAIN (99-01), and i dont think that's worth betting on. if it was, there would be other gonzagas out there.

    for those reasons, they need to capitalize as soon as possible. by capitalize, i mean 3rd wknd of the dance.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Spokane Valley
    Posts
    8,488

    Default

    The Spokane community has supported the Gonzaga program in the up years and the "down" years (1st weekend exits)-- it would take an extended period of down time (5-7 years no tourney) related to loss of coaching staff, lack of financial commitment to the program and inability to recruit to the program to contribute to a down period.

    With the schools financial commitment, incoming recruits and existing staff-- a downturn does not look to be imminent in the next 3-5 years.

    Probably cross the bridge when we come to it-- but worrying over what "could possibly" occur if a good number of negative things lined up related to the program rather than looking at the positive results of what the team did this year-- in a year where we lost 4 of 5 starters from an elite 8 team -- and still got back to a sweet 16.

    The "risk factors are minimal" for an imminent downturn.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Edgewood, WA
    Posts
    1,491

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cbbfanatic View Post
    I love this kind of macro topic, so here's my somewhat removed-from-the-minutiae, stream of consciousness take...

    i agree with the premise that GU's success is tenuous. to a degree, all programs that are high-achieving are doing so on a thin line. even the true elites can fall for a short term, but they can much more easily bounce back. that's what this is all about for me, how would GU bounce back from a slip? well, that's the first part. the second part is: how do they keep up what they've done?

    to start, i think you need to assess the higher level factors that could become headwinds, and are more or less inherent to the program. also, this is assuming that gonzaga has already fallen some and needs to rebound. As long as they stay on current trend, these factors are not huge killers, though still not ideal.

    for gu, i'd say these are the key risks that you could file as "external factors:"

    Spokane: as much as many on here love spokane, it's not going to help gonzaga in the case of slippage, for a couple reasons. first, there is not enough local talent in spokane and surrounding area to recruit a highly competitive team (or even core) locally, and over the long term. how many GSL kids per year, or decade, go on to become big name college bball players? very few. so you have to bring kids in. to that end, it's not overly appealing to the general public that doesnt have a familiarity with the city and area. it's very remote and cold in season. not a destination city for the 18 year old bball star that travels around the country playing in tournaments in all sorts of glamorous locales. even for kids from seattle, its a tougher sell than many, many places in the US. you can even extend GU/Spokane's "local" recruiting territory east through Montana if you'd like, since there is no real local competition for those kids.

    Conference: very similar to Spokane, the WCC isnt attracting the kids you need to rebuild from any slip to mediocrity. its not a destination conference, doesn't have glamorous dates on the sched (nice cities, sure, but not big name opponents). i dont see this changing. even if the other teams improve some, there is a very real ceiling. to get to the point where high level kids grow up wanting to play in the WCC feels borderline impossible. if you dont believe this, look at the kids the OTHER wcc teams are bringing in. again, all of this is about a situation where GU needs to climb back (which is seemingly inevitable at some point)

    Prestige/Elite"ness": I only bring this one up because someone else mentioned it earlier as something GU could re-build off of should a rebuilding day come (and i disagree with it in that context)... I know this one will be controversial, but should GU fall without getting multiple f4s and maybe a title, the enduring legacy will get washed away with many other programs that have had nice little runs - even if they pale in comparison to what GU has done. Might seem unfair, but you don't build the kind of legacy that attracts 4/5 star kids by going to a handful of s16s and a few e8s. those are great in the moment, but certainly have shelf lives. we've all seen the highlights in some posters signatures, but here's some context behind the 7 s16s and 2 e8s... since 1999, 272 s16 appearances have been earned, 136 to the elite 8, and 68 for the f4. granted that only one per year is available to any given team, but this frames up just how many of these accomplishments have been spread out (albeit very unevenly) across the landscape. for further final four context, since 1999, 32 different teams have gone to the final four. 32. 16 of them have gone more than once. to be even close to elite, i think you'd have to be in that second group of multiple f4 appearance teams.

    again, this is all from the angle that GU has to climb the mtn again. i think kids NOW are largely signing up for the CURRENT success. if that goes away, i dont think prestige is cashing the checks. thats just me though

    the first two are the big ones to me. the ones that you cant really change.

    but GU has been fine on that front for almost 2 decades now, so why can't they continue to stay on track? more to the point, WHAT will cause them to fall?

    this begs the question of how GU has stayed where they are for so long... and how risky is that proposition? can they stay on their model for the indefinite future?

    So here's how i see Gonzaga's last 15+ years, and how they've stayed so consistent: i also assess a risk to continuing these success factors

    Coaching continuity & consistency: say what you want about mark few (that preface would be more directed towards his detractors, obviously), but he really knows how to build a balanced team, both 1-5 and fr-sr, that for the most part looks the same year after year. he also beats the teams they should beat with an INCREDIBLE regularity. His total win pct is absolutely incredible when you back it up against his % against the top 25 (think that's in the low-mid 20s). If his teams had the propensity to drop games to teams they shouldnt, like most teams do, there are some NIT years mixed in there because lets face it, the record against the true top of CBB really isnt all that good. mix in some NIT years, and maybe the allure isnt there for a couple key kids along the way, and maybe they lose the momentum? who knows. what i do know is that the consistency has been amazing. as long as Few is around, i'd say risk of losing this positive attribute is low. no reason to believe he doesnt keep doing what he's doing on this front

    "non-traditional" recruiting: most high end teams are built mostly through getting US (really should say north american) HS stars to sign up right out of HS. GU hasnt really done this at a level that coincides with their on-court success, but has really supplemented the HS pipeline with some high quality transfers and foreign players. so many of these guys like batista (my all time favorite), turiaf, some of the early australians, karnowski, sabonis, and more were incredibly important to continuity of success. if ANY of these guys didnt pan out in spades, their teams would have struggled significantly. im sure there are some that didnt pan out, but the success rate in this recruiting channel has to be at or near the top of college bball. the same can be said for high level transfers. knight, dickau, wiltjer, etc. international guys and transfers flop ALL THE TIME. but not at GU. at GU, they've been consistent cornerstones. this is a huge risk to me. if the international well dries up (seems to hinge on one coach), or they miss on some xfers that REALLY need to pan out (one next yr comes to mind), it could be problematic. overall depth of talent is great for WCC, but not for the peer group GU wants to associate with... these non-traditional guys need to keep panning out.

    There's a lot more to the success, but the two above i think have been very vital. i think consistency can last as long as few is around, and the aspect of roster building is just always going to be risky (but also always has been, and its worked). once one of those pillars falls, i think GU could be in trouble of losing footing in its current tier. from there, they're fighting location and conference to get back to where they are today. they could do it, but it would take catching lightning in a bottle AGAIN (99-01), and i dont think that's worth betting on. if it was, there would be other gonzagas out there.

    for those reasons, they need to capitalize as soon as possible. by capitalize, i mean 3rd wknd of the dance.
    Does the "Spokane" factor swing the other way with transfer kids? While a 17 or 18 year old may be looking for a beach, or pretty girls, does a graduate transfer with a season or two left want a place where they can focus on making the most of their limited time - distraction free?

    I was recruited, once long ago, to play a college sport. I was mature for my age trying to make long term decisions without a great support system locally. I could have signed to play football locally with a very prestigious school just a few years removed from a national championship. I wanted to focus on academics and chose a location close enough my financially poor family could still come see me, but far enough away that I could focus on my goals without distraction of certain influences at home. It worked out well for me. I wonder, if the more mature transfer student who has already experienced some of college life, might find Spokane appealing for all the reasons they might not have liked it initially.

  25. #25

    Default

    This program hasn't even peaked, yet. And if they stay in the WCC, then it would take another year with the combination of trials (or like them) that we witnessed to have another "close call" year. How often has that happened? With the acceleration in our talent acquisition, you could make the case that it is less likely to happen, moving forward.

    I wouldn't be surprised if GU pays Tommy to stay put.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •