Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 28

Thread: Thoughts on Gonzaga's Defense

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    12,313

    Default Thoughts on Gonzaga's Defense

    Because it's so hard to lose I think that we all blame the loss onto Gonzaga's poor 3 point shooting defense. I honestly believe that this Gonzaga team had the best defense against the 3 point shot than any other Gonzaga team. Gonzaga made huge strides this year in team defense. I don't think they need a new coach to teach them a new defense.

    At the time of our loss, I don't think any of us, accept Sili, really felt that Wichita State was as good as they are. We should remember that they made it to the Final Four by beating teams who did defend the 3. Ohio State is known for a great defensive team, yet they lost to the Shockers. I don't think they will go out looking for a new defensive coach. In the end credit has to be given to the Shockers. They have played great in this tournament, and have made unbelievable shots against all the teams they beat.

    March Madness has always been about Cinderella teams upsetting highly ranked teams. It IS what has made this tournament what it is. Unfortunately that Cinderella team came up against GU and beat us and robbed us from our chance of making it to the Final 4. Each year we see that there really is not much difference any more between Major and Mid-Major basketball team, and that basketball parity is now the case.

    This year, overall, Gonzaga defended the 3 point shot pretty well. We beat every team in our conference twice, and two teams 3 times because we did defend the 3 point shot well. Overall, I was really impressed with Gonzaga's defense this year, and felt it was a beautiful thing to watch. They just got beat by a team who was very, very, very hot at the end of the game, And, yes lucky. Every coach, when talking about the NCAA tournament, says that to win it all does take some luck. Maybe Wichita State hitting all those shots at the end had something to do with that thing they call luck.

    Go Zags!!! The Best is yet to come!!!
    Go Zags!!! The Best Is Yet To Come!!!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    13,301

    Default

    The thing that just keeps coming back to my mind again and again after watching the Southern and Wich St. games was how their long range shooters just shot over the top of GU's guards again and again.....even if GU's guards properly closed out.

    It's very frustrating to go from that to watching the Syracuse and Louisville defenses come out with all their length and systematically destroy their opponent's ability to shoot 3's.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,745

    Default

    While the Zags 3pt defense was improved this year, at least according to opposing teams' 3pt percentage against GU, it's hard to see it in the Dance, where the Zags gave up 47% or so to teams that weren't great from the line. And while Wichita St has proven itself a legit team by beating some good defensive teams on the way to the Final Four, the Zags are the only one they killed from the perimeter. Chalk it up to our size inside, their hot hand, or more likely, a combination of our lack of size on the perimeter, missed assignments, an injured defender and their hot hand.

    WSU 3pt shooting in the Dance:
    vs Pitt: 2-10
    vs GU: 14-28
    vs La Salle: 5-12
    vs Ohio St: 8-20
    “We’re not here as a %&#* courtesy!" - Coach Few

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    12,665

    Default

    For the past two weeks that's exactly what's been gnawing at my belly too CDC. Longth is one thing but Louisville isn't all that long out front and they still manage to shut off 3 point shooting. Syracuse' defense ......and it's been this way for years.......is something to emulate but few do/can.

    Either we have the absolute worst luck or we need to erase the board and start over. Just be random chance, we cannot be this bad at 3 pt defense. It's nearly impossible. And yet, teams with seeming little 3 pt expertise clean up against us from 3 land. It's a mystery. They meet up with us, and they're magicians at shooting 3's. I'm sure the coaches have noticed. What to do? I dunno.

    Syracuse has long kids who use that zone. Louisville's kids are just quick to the ball but to be fair, Pitino has a very workable system. ...certainly nothing genius.

    It's got to be frightening/infuriating to the staff to know what's coming but not be capable of stopping it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Spokane
    Posts
    2,839

    Default

    Ok, what we need this off season is to find a way for Kevin, Gary and David to grow 3-5 inches taller...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Boise, Idaho
    Posts
    763

    Default

    We got a lifetime supply of breaks and luck and good fortune in the late 1990's. Since then, we have to scratch and claw for everything in the tournament.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Oklafriggenhoma
    Posts
    7,282

    Default

    I wonder how Florida fans feel about the number1 scoring defense in the country giving up 10 of 19 from "3"? Are they demanding change?
    Birddog

    Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
    Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:
    All mimsy were the borogoves,
    And the mome raths outgrabe.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    2,070

    Default

    Nice post, Reborn... I feel the same way. I keep hearing how the Zags weren't tough enough and/or they can't defend the three - but looking at the season as a whole, I thought they showed both of those things throughout the entire season - better than they had in years.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    12,665

    Default

    When it comes to 3 pt defense in the Wichita State game, here's a corker! Looks like a crazy stat..but it's a true one. Ewwwwww...what luck!



    Per @tjonessltrib, Wichita State's hit their last seven threes. Chances of a .330 team (their regular-season mark) doing that: 2346-to-1

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Spokane / Goodyear, AZ
    Posts
    1,988

    Default Observation

    In watching the NCAA's I noticed the refs were allowing defenders on the perimeter to get much closer and have far more contact outside than the typical WCC refs would allow.

    Is it possible that our players are conditioned to be a bit too careful defending the perimeter because of learned behavior from tight WCC refs? We just were not glued to the opposition like many of the high octane eastern teams are defending the perimeter. Tons of contact with no calls is what I observed.

    Is this a possible explanation to some degree?
    To Fish & Game: Keep streams stocked well for Mr. Few!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    1,581

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Birddog View Post
    I wonder how Florida fans feel about the number1 scoring defense in the country giving up 10 of 19 from "3"? Are they demanding change?
    Is it a yearly problem for them as well?
    I am working on being a more all around square.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Oklafriggenhoma
    Posts
    7,282

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zagsker View Post
    Is it a yearly problem for them as well?
    Actually I got it wrong, my memory was off a little. Florida was 3rd in the country for fewest pts allowed and 9th in FG% defense. You got the gist of what I meant by my post. I'm solidly in the camp that feels the Zags problem if any is personnel not defensive scheme. Did you notice how many wide open 3's Florida gave up from the baseline corner? I mean WIDE open! They allowed 53% from "3".
    Birddog

    Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
    Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:
    All mimsy were the borogoves,
    And the mome raths outgrabe.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    The Steel City
    Posts
    278

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CDC84 View Post
    The thing that just keeps coming back to my mind again and again after watching the Southern and Wich St. games was how their long range shooters just shot over the top of GU's guards again and again.....even if GU's guards properly closed out.

    It's very frustrating to go from that to watching the Syracuse and Louisville defenses come out with all their length and systematically destroy their opponent's ability to shoot 3's.
    CDC, I couldn't agree more. I think the error was with not adjusting the 2-3 Zone for this team where the guards are not, shall we say, long/tall. A modified 3-2 may have helped, because our defense on the blocks kept improving all year. It may have helped to frustrat their shooters before they were able to get shots up that were either open (GBJ's injury playing a role) or overtop our smaller backcourt lineup. The way we win, is to force them to shoot over KO, SD, and EH. The way we lose is exactly how it went down.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Edgewood, WA
    Posts
    1,496

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Birddog View Post
    I'm solidly in the camp that feels the Zags problem if any is personnel not defensive scheme. Did you notice how many wide open 3's Florida gave up from the baseline corner? I mean WIDE open! They allowed 53% from "3".
    Anecdotal evidence aside (Florida's game), we have consistently underperformed in two areas during the Mark Few era. 1. 3 pt field goal defense, and 2. steal percentage.

    With the arrival of Ray G and David Stockton our steal percentage has steadily climbed and is much more acceptable.

    Our 3 pt field goal defense continues to be our worst attribute as a team (other than in 2012 and 2008). Year in and year out. If 15 years isn't a large enough sample size to determine that part of the problem is "scheme," then I don't know what is...


    That said, just because the scheme has been exploited by good three point shooting teams doesn't mean we should change it. During the same 15 years where we consistently underperformed in this area we have been very successful and were able to do a lot of other things amazingly well. It's possible that if we extend the defense to take away the three, our defensive FG% (which is traditionally very good) climbs as teams get to the rim more often.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,962

    Default

    Top 10 2P% defenses over the past 5 seasons:

    Code:
    Team           Pct    SD  
    Kansas        -8.34 -14.2
    UConn         -7.58 -13.4
    Kentucky      -7.37 -12.8
    Texas         -6.03 -10.2
    Florida St    -6.10  -9.6
    Louisville    -5.73  -9.5
    Memphis       -5.53  -9.4
    Miss St       -5.38  -9.1
    Gonzaga       -5.11  -8.1
    USC           -5.18  -8.1
    The percentage above is how opponents 2P% fared against these teams compared to their average.


    Per Ken Pomeroy, teams with better 2P% defenses tend to have better 3P% defenses:




    The overall effect a team can influence 3P% is minimal (3% or less) compared to 2P% defense, however.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    6,733

    Default

    With our low post players they were forced to beat us from the outside. It worked.
    Quote Originally Posted by FuManShoes View Post
    While the Zags 3pt defense was improved this year, at least according to opposing teams' 3pt percentage against GU, it's hard to see it in the Dance, where the Zags gave up 47% or so to teams that weren't great from the line. And while Wichita St has proven itself a legit team by beating some good defensive teams on the way to the Final Four, the Zags are the only one they killed from the perimeter. Chalk it up to our size inside, their hot hand, or more likely, a combination of our lack of size on the perimeter, missed assignments, an injured defender and their hot hand.

    WSU 3pt shooting in the Dance:
    vs Pitt: 2-10
    vs GU: 14-28
    vs La Salle: 5-12
    vs Ohio St: 8-20
    Go Zags!!!

  17. #17

    Default

    Wow, that 2pt defense stat is really impressive. Might have even played a role against Wichita St if we didn't give up 14 3s.

    I agree that our guards are too short, which allows the opponent to shoot over the top. My question is: knowing this, why not make an adjustment? Maybe focusing on their quickness to prevent attempts?

    People can complain about Coach K as they want. The simple truth is that he adjusts his team year to year, based on who he has. Seems to work pretty well, versus trying the same thing over and over but expecting a different result.

    As much as I loathe the quote, "You go to war with the army you have" is pretty fitting in this case. You can't keep going with a game plan that pretends your weaknesses don't exist. At some point "Keep sawing wood" becomes "La la la I can't hear youuuuu!", and sooner or later comes back to bite you.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    6,733

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by surfmonkey89 View Post
    People can complain about Coach K as they want. The simple truth is that he adjusts his team year to year, based on who he has. Seems to work pretty well, versus trying the same thing over and over but expecting a different result.
    Gosh, it sure would be nice to have all those all-americans...could you imagine what Coach Few could do then?
    Go Zags!!!

  19. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cjm720 View Post
    Gosh, it sure would be nice to have all those all-americans...could you imagine what Coach Few could do then?
    Please. The point was that, even with the talent they get, they still have to adjust the game plan year to year.

    We have lesser talent (which shouldn't be considered an insult compared to Duke), so if anything we should be MORE flexible.

    Instead, we've been lamenting the same problems for over a decade.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    6,733

    Default

    I won't take the time to look but I am certain our defense has statistically gotten better, especially this year and behind the arc.
    Go Zags!!!

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Edgewood, WA
    Posts
    1,496

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cjm720 View Post
    I won't take the time to look but I am certain our defense has statistically gotten better, especially this year and behind the arc.
    This year's defense was better, but not behind the arc.

    We held opponents to 31% behind the arc last year, good for 31st in the nation.

    This year we held them to 32.9%, good for 115th overall.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Boise, Idaho
    Posts
    763

    Default

    Zagco does not get why the 3-point line in college basketball is where it is. It should be at the international distance.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,363

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zagco View Post
    Zagco does not get why the 3-point line in college basketball is where it is. It should be at the international distance.
    This.

    I also feel that the shot clock is too long.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,015

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CDC84 View Post
    The thing that just keeps coming back to my mind again and again after watching the Southern and Wich St. games was how their long range shooters just shot over the top of GU's guards again and again.....even if GU's guards properly closed out.

    It's very frustrating to go from that to watching the Syracuse and Louisville defenses come out with all their length and systematically destroy their opponent's ability to shoot 3's.
    a bit of a contradiction here...L'ville starting guards are 6'0" and 6'1" ...they are shorter than the Zags ...this 3-point defense myth is just that ..Wichita State got the same looks against Pittsburgh and went 2-20 ...they got the same looks against OSU and went 8-20, same looks against LaSalle (starting guards of 6'1 and 6'0") and went 5-12 ....and against the Zags they went 14-28 ....
    It's What You learn AFTER You Know It All That Counts

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    7,422

    Default

    We should have rotated EH, KO and Sam/Barham/PK to the 3 point line, and had KP, DS, KD cover the inside! That would have shut down those 3's!

    But seriously, they made some crazy, amazing shots, ones that shouldn't have gone in. We lost GBJ on the outside, and it still took a couple of missed calls for them to beat us.

    Maybe the mantra should be, "No guards under 6'8"! that would handle the length. Of course there are those that would complain that those little 6' guys just run circles around our big fellas!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •