Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 36

Thread: Was Indiana overrated or was Syracuse just a bad matchup? Ditto GU vs WSU

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,745

    Default Was Indiana overrated or was Syracuse just a bad matchup? Ditto GU vs WSU

    Seeing lots of pieces claiming Indiana was overrated. And yes, they lost games throughout the year that suggested they were not the top team in the college hoops and then got skunked last night. But hey, even the Miami Heat lose once in a while. Point is, does losing a game mean you were no good, or that you were no good on that day or just faced a bad matchup? Fran was all over Syracuse vs Indiana and I followed his lead. Doesn't mean Indiana is no good - means Syracuse could and did exploit a good team's weakness.
    “We’re not here as a %&#* courtesy!" - Coach Few

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    13,330

    Default

    Hoosiers were the most talented team in the dance. They aren't overrated.

    Indiana's biggest weakness is their impatience on offense. They launch too many quick shots because they have so many scorers. That's deadly against 'Cuse's zone. I actually picked IU to lose that game.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    696

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FuManShoes View Post
    Seeing lots of pieces claiming Indiana was overrated. And yes, they lost games throughout the year that suggested they were not the top team in the college hoops and then got skunked last night. But hey, even the Miami Heat lose once in a while. Point is, does losing a game mean you were no good, or that you were no good on that day or just faced a bad matchup? Fran was all over Syracuse vs Indiana and I followed his lead. Doesn't mean Indiana is no good - means Syracuse could and did exploit a good team's weakness.
    thats a good question fumanshoes. I for one do not think that this tourney in any given year is the absolute definition as to if a team is "not very good" if they get beat earlier than expected. Its tough. Sometimes you just dont play your best at the tourney time. in the case of indiana and gonzaga, they both got outplayed by their last two opponents in this tourney. They both barely overcame there one crappy game of tourney (GU vs Southern and Indiana vs Temple) and barely survived what wouldve been embarrasing losses. Then they both followed that up by being outplayed in there next game (GU vs WSU and Indiana vs Syracuse) and couldnt overcome and win cuz the quality of team was better and finished those respective games stronger than GU or Indiana did. I still think Indiana was a good team and had a good year, Syracuse is a tough matchup for anybody. Syacuse has been playing good the last few weeks dating back to semi in big east tourney vs georgetown. Syracuse is going to be a tough team to beat. Gonzaga I must say was a good team this year and had a great season but Gonzaga this year was not an elite team. I would say they zags were more like about the 15th best team in country, which is no slouch and nothing to be ashamed of at all. No offense meant by that at all either. Indiana was probably about a #6 to #8 tyoe of team. No offense meant by that either.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    696

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CDC84 View Post
    Hoosiers were the most talented team in the dance. They aren't overrated.

    Indiana's biggest weakness is their impatience on offense. They launch too many quick shots because they have so many scorers. That's deadly against 'Cuse's zone. I actually picked IU to lose that game.
    I agree with you CDC84 that the hoosiers had the most overall talent in tourney this year.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Chesterfield, MO.
    Posts
    1,131

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CDC84 View Post
    Hoosiers were the most talented team in the dance. They aren't overrated.

    Indiana's biggest weakness is their impatience on offense. They launch too many quick shots because they have so many scorers. That's deadly against 'Cuse's zone. I actually picked IU to lose that game.
    This. Not overrated. Just ran into a tough matchup opponent and then had a down game to boot.
    Gonzaga Basketball
    Exhibiting Character Since 1907

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    The Pub
    Posts
    7,609

    Default

    Teams that peak in March beat teams that peak in February. It think that Indiana is a more talented team than the Orange, but Syracuse is playing at its highest level of the season at exactly the right time. I'm not sure that Indiana can say the same thing.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,365

    Default

    Regardless of who is actually overrated and who isnt, Indiana is going to be ranked and seeded nice and fairly in the future.

    Fairly or unfairly, we get to deal with buzz words like "soft" and "underachieving" until we prove otherwise.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    4,079

    Default Ahhh...

    Misery loves company. Having the #1 seed lose makes me feel better.
    “People can talk. People can speculate. These guys are hungry and they're ready to go." Mark Few

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    6,734

    Default

    It means that anyone can beat anyone...we proved that both ways.
    Go Zags!!!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    72

    Default

    There's no shame in losing to a good Syracuse team. Indiana wasn't overrated imo. Certainly matchups play a role, but also how well a team is executing on a given day. Sometimes the shots just don't fall; sometimes refs blow key calls. Given the parity of this year's field, all of these variables become that much more crucial in determining the outcome of a game. There's no one team that is decisively better than the rest of the competition as to render these factors meaningless. It doesn't mean the top teams are overrated, it just means that there's not much of a gap between top tier and second tier teams.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,028

    Default

    not overrated.

    there were plenty of good data points on indiana this year that suggest they were one of the top teams. they just ran into a cuse team that is playing well and is unique with their great, disruptive zone personnel and execution.

    really hard to duplicate that in practice to prepare, and it was evident that indiana was unprepared to deal with the length and athleticism in syracuse's zone. Carter-Williams having an uncharacteristically great shooting night didnt help indiana either

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Spokane
    Posts
    1,819

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cjm720 View Post
    we proved that both ways.
    How so?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    7,300

    Default

    Indiana was ok...but they didn't beat anyone...beating teams like Northwestern, Nebraska, Minnesota , Penn State, Iowa...won't get you ready for the Tourney... Mich hasn't been to a Sweet Sixteen for 19 years...has Northwestern ever been to the Tourney ??

    If they want to get over the hump ...to get to the next level...

    They need to join a better conference like the Catholic 7...

    How many Sweet Sixteens has Indiana had in the last 15 years before this year ???

    They just don't see athletes like that in fly over country.

    I really think that the only team that can beat Cuse...is Cuse...and they do.
    Last edited by bartruff1; 03-29-2013 at 07:14 PM.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Spokane
    Posts
    1,819

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bartruff1 View Post
    If they want to get over the hump ...to get to the next level...

    They need to join a better conference like the Catholic 7...
    I feel like this is a conversation that's been had a lot around here concerning another team. Can't remember which one right now.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    sierra foothills
    Posts
    13,339

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bartruff1 View Post
    Indiana was ok...but they didn't beat anyone...beating teams like Northwestern, Nebraska, Minnisota, Penn State, Iowa...won't get you ready for the Tourney... Mich hasn't been to a Sweet Sixteen for 19 years...has Northwestern ever been to the Tourney ??

    If they want to get over the hump ...to get to the next level...

    They need to join a better conference like the Catholic 7...

    How many Sweet Sixteens has Indiana had in the last 15 years before this year ???

    They just don't see athletes like that in fly over country.

    I really think that the only team that can beat Cuse...is Cuse...and they do.
    funny

    Of course Indiana did beat teams like MSU and Big Blue twice each, beat OhioSt at Columbus, and more

    and against some popular trending here at GU boards, I'll give Syracuse's D a big tip of the cap for forcing Indiana into shooting 3-15 from deep (Hulls 0-6 after shooting 45% for the year) and not succumbing to thinking that their efforts on D don't affect 3 point %

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Boise, Idaho
    Posts
    763

    Default

    Zagco never quite got the 1 seed for Indiana. Everytime Zagco paid attention to them during the last couple weeks of the season, they were losing. Indiana just simply tailed off at the end of the season.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    7,300

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bballbeachbum View Post
    funny

    Of course Indiana did beat teams like MSU and Big Blue twice each, beat OhioSt at Columbus, and more

    and against some popular trending here at GU boards, I'll give Syracuse's D a big tip of the cap for forcing Indiana into shooting 3-15 from deep (Hulls 0-6 after shooting 45% for the year) and not succumbing to thinking that their efforts on D don't affect 3 point %
    No one can defend the three......the point is to win the game.. if we only lose games when someone goes nuts from the 3 point line...that is fine with me.. the whole thing is a red herring...

    I'll go with Cad...it is mostly good shooting, not poor defense and mostly poor shooting and not good defense.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Napa, CA
    Posts
    4,522

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bballbeachbum View Post
    funny

    Of course Indiana did beat teams like MSU and Big Blue twice each, beat OhioSt at Columbus, and more

    and against some popular trending here at GU boards, I'll give Syracuse's D a big tip of the cap for forcing Indiana into shooting 3-15 from deep (Hulls 0-6 after shooting 45% for the year) and not succumbing to thinking that their efforts on D don't affect 3 point %
    As a note, Syracuse's zone is specifically mentioned as an exception to the 3 point shooting thing.
    I will thank God for the day and the moment I have. - Jimmy V

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Boise, Idaho
    Posts
    763

    Default

    The Cuse likes those long, lean guys up high. When you watch them play, it looks like they have 2 Scottie Pippins defending the high part of the zone. Pippin was playing zone before it was allowed in the NBA. He had the range to defend the paint and the line.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    7,300

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zagco View Post
    The Cuse likes those long, lean guys up high. When you watch them play, it looks like they have 2 Scottie Pippins defending the high part of the zone. Pippin was playing zone before it was allowed in the NBA. He had the range to defend the paint and the line.
    I think they will have to beat themselves...to lose this tourney.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    6,734

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HOOTER View Post
    How so?
    Just us winning games people thought we wouldn't but then losing to witchita state. Being overrated should not be defined by one game.
    Go Zags!!!

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    sierra foothills
    Posts
    13,339

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bartruff1 View Post
    No one can defend the three......the point is to win the game.. if we only lose games when someone goes nuts from the 3 point line...that is fine with me.. the whole thing is a red herring...

    I'll go with Cad...it is mostly good shooting, not poor defense and mostly poor shooting and not good defense.
    please consider a couple of homegrown examples to the understanding

    Remember when Matt would face the longer athletic matchups and struggle to shoot well? Is the belief that those defensive matchups weren't the reason he struggled, and that it wasn't because of the D he faced since 3 pt D doesn't really matter? Or an example from this year: was the Zags better 3Pt D% with GBj on the floor vs. when he was off the floor (check out Samwise's thread btw) not because of the better 3 pt D the Zags play with him on the floor? since 3 pt D is basically irrelevant and it's about good/poor shooting?

    is that really the belief? not from me

    without discounting anything cad's analysis shows and outlines, defense and defensive matchups matter. It's kind of a disservice to GBj's abilities to not credit his skills in this area seems to me.

    anyway, I don't expect you'll agree with my thoughts here, seems I'm disagreeing with many on this one


  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    7,300

    Default

    You can always find examples or even statistics to support a reasonable opinion.... I think the important point is that teams can usually get clean three point attempts (drive and kick out...swing the ball...pull up on a break.. ect...) so in the majority of the cases, it is a matter of making them...good shooting..

    Yes it hurts... and when it hurts you want it to stop...but Gonzaga played about 35 games and more than likely there were a lot of three point attempts in all of those games....and I think they only lost 2 because someone had a career night...those are good odds...and I don't know that any team of the 350 or so in D1 had more success... like I said ...red herring...

    I am not saying defense is irrelevant or that they shouldn't do their best or that matchup don't matter...but that if the shooter is hot, he will make them.. good shooting will beat good defense...and this is not a problem unique to Gonzaga.

    IMHO of course.

  24. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bartruff1 View Post
    You can always find examples or even statistics to support a reasonable opinion.
    You really should have stopped right there.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,894

    Default

    I said this once I'll say it again...I do not understand why more folks don't play zone. Boeheim recruts for his zone...he always has long guys who can defend the line. Not to mention his bigs get rested on every defensive play. When you play Syracuse theres really only one issue...if you can shoot 3's over LONG guards you win...most lose. You also only get 1 shot cause you've got 3 big guys guarding the hoop. Sometimes those LONGS aren't the greatest scorers but, most times its enough to win. They could win it all too. The above posters are correct...its not what Syracuse's oppponents do..its what Syracuse does. They control the outcome for the most part...Boeheim also seems to have his guys on top of their game come March.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •