Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 27

Thread: #3

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,048

    Default #3

    Why not? Pitt beats the Cougs by 15 late in essentially a home game. We beat the Cougs by 22 in Pullman. I'm sure it won't happen but there is no doubt in my mind we are better than Pitt.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,522

    Default

    If WSU had beat down baylor, perhaps. I think a lot of people aren't sure about WSU yet, and for that reason, nobody will know how good of a win this is until later in the season.
    Krozman
    GU student 1996-2000
    Law Student 2000-2003

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    13,281

    Default

    Gonzaga has also played 3 more high major teams than Pitt...including Tennessee.

    Pitt may have won by 15, but they were fighting for their lives until the last 4 minutes of the game when Wazzu's offense went sour. The Zags had the Cougs down by 33 at one point in the 2nd half.

    That being said, if GU beats Zona (not a given) I would be highly surprised if GU supplants Pitt in the polls. It's just the way things work.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,048

    Default

    I'm not sure how that relates to what I wrote Kroz? Head to head vs the same opponent is what I'm talking about. Our win was more impressive not to mention we've beaten better opposition than Pitt.

    Beat me to it CDC.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    667

    Default

    In all honesty, id put us at #2. Yes, #2. UCONN never fires on all cylinders at once. They always have to one or two players winning games for them. That near loss to Buffalo only solidifies it. GU #2.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Spo Vegas
    Posts
    2,309

    Default

    Shoot, I'll have to one-up ya and say #2 (and I ain't scared of NC either). Uconn isn't living up to the hype and I guess we'll get to see what's what on the 20th, but I'm saying we're better than them also.
    It's peanut butter jelly time!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Spo Vegas
    Posts
    2,309

    Default

    Aw, ya beat me to the post, JohnO. Nice move.
    It's peanut butter jelly time!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    667

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NotoriousZ View Post
    Aw, ya beat me to the post, JohnO. Nice move.
    And you too, Notorious. A good call on both of our parts.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,048

    Default

    I too agree with your posts but we're going to have to beat them before that happens.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    9,534

    Default

    In my complete homerific eyes. having seen the team twice in person. We're #1 or 2.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Moscow, Idaho
    Posts
    3,540

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NotoriousZ View Post
    Shoot, I'll have to one-up ya and say #2 (and I ain't scared of NC either). Uconn isn't living up to the hype and I guess we'll get to see what's what on the 20th, but I'm saying we're better than them also.
    Kool-aid time! #2 is looking better all the time.
    When I die, I want to go peacefully like my Grandfather did, in his sleep - not screaming, like the passengers in his car.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Woodinville, WA
    Posts
    2,801

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thespywhozaggedme View Post
    In my complete homerific eyes. having seen the team twice in person. We're #1 or 2.
    After last night I got to agree. I think if we beat AZ and Uconn, we are legitimately the #2 team in the land. Scary to think that would put the team one UNC misstep in an ACC road game away from #1. Yikes.

    damn I'm excited!!
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach Few
    We are not here as a #%$&%&! Courtesy!!!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Maple Valley, WA
    Posts
    3,228

    Default

    I know we're all on cloud 9 and, yes, the team played very very well last night, but, hoenstly, I can't say I believe the hype until this team wins the battle of the boards by a decent margin against a good rebounding team. As it stands, the team is very very good, yes. But not FF good IMO.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    8,329

    Default

    I don't care if we're unranked, as long as we keep winning.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,048

    Default

    I know we're all on cloud 9 and, yes, the team played very very well last night, but, hoenstly, I can't say I believe the hype until this team wins the battle of the boards by a decent margin against a good rebounding team. As it stands, the team is very very good, yes. But not FF good IMO.
    Not as concerned about rebounding like some others. We got outrebounded by 25 against Tenn and had an 18 point lead late in the game. I don't see us losing games because of getting outrebounded. I see us blowing teams out even worse when we start outrebounding teams.

    What does this team have to do to impress you? How can you not see this team is FF and national championship good? I'm an optimist but anyone can see that this team is as good as anyone.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    13,281

    Default

    I would be more concerned about the rebounding if Gonzaga weren't holding teams to below 34% shooting. I think the Zags are concentrating so much effort on guarding the shot that the rebounding is suffering a bit. This isn't to say that it couldn't get better. But as long as teams keep missing shots against that defense, I can live with substandard rebounding margins.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,048

    Default

    Great point.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    4

    Default

    Pitt doesn't play decent teams either. A win over UMBC or Sienna doesn't prove much. A win over UA would prove much more. We should jump 'em.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    874

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CDC84 View Post
    I would be more concerned about the rebounding if Gonzaga weren't holding teams to below 34% shooting. I think the Zags are concentrating so much effort on guarding the shot that the rebounding is suffering a bit. This isn't to say that it couldn't get better. But as long as teams keep missing shots against that defense, I can live with substandard rebounding margins.
    I second that great point. I have been a bit worried at Heytvelt's rebounding numbers as of late, but obviously I need to get my head on straight and stop worrying about these things. Our team is winning, playing unbelievable defense, and our boy Heytvelt is a huge part of why these things are happening. What a game he had last night.
    Thanks for the perspective CDC.
    "You miss 100% of the shots you don't take."
    -Zach Norvell Jr.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Daytona Beach, Fl
    Posts
    147

    Default rank

    The rebounding will become an issue once the team gets into a close game. I think this team has all the potential but the key is realizing it. Until we are a little more consistant on the boards and with free throws I'll remain cautiously optomistic.

    To stay on topic with the original thread, I see us remaining at #4 for now. Gonzaga is still viewed by the majority of the east coast/midwest as a cinderalla type. Until we make another deep tourney run (or take the whole thing!) it will be tough to get the benefit of the doubt from the polls.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    154

    Default

    You guys are brainwashed by the BCS system. You cant loose positions in college basketball by winning. Very rare. its a system that is actually FAIR.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    9,475

    Default I agree with Nevtelen & disagree w/CDC

    Quote Originally Posted by CDC84 View Post
    I would be more concerned about the rebounding if Gonzaga weren't holding teams to below 34% shooting. I think the Zags are concentrating so much effort on guarding the shot that the rebounding is suffering a bit. This isn't to say that it couldn't get better. But as long as teams keep missing shots against that defense, I can live with substandard rebounding margins.

    our game plan should not, imo, count on the other guy missing.

    it should count on us rounding out our game, our weaknesses and Nevtelen nailed it.

    On another point, I know there are divisions between those who love to see JH on the perimiter sinking threes. They make me cringe. We have perhaps the best lineup of shooters ever and our big guy at the top of the key ? If we could put Matt underneath, and not suffer any height loss, that might be different. But what we get is a void.

    WTF is THAT about ? Sort of like letting the center play quarterback at the end of a game. So what if he can pass ? He's a Center. I sure as hell don't want to see him playing QB in the first quarter.

    The first team to beat us, I predict, will be the one that sets up underneath, dominates the space and puts the pressure on us to beat them from downtown.

    With that said, we might just get away with it because we are capable of beating anyone this year, given our talent pool. It all depends on whether we get flustered, like WSU did with its gameplan last night.

    But the better teams won't get flustered, imo. they will exploit that glaring weakness and try to get us out of our game. JH could average 20 plus each night and 14 of those points could be layups and the other 6-10 free throws.


    At least layups are higher percentage shots, and more predictable. Not to mention a much smarter and less stressful way to beat our opponents.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Fircrest
    Posts
    1,418

    Default

    fwiw, my co-worker is a pitt fan (his father works at the university) and he is as crazy about pitt as i am about gonzaga. we spoke this morning about the wsu game, and he said that at this point in the season, he doesn't see why we shouldn't be ranked above pitt.

    that being said, the difference between being ranked 4 or 3 imo is negligible. we just keep taking care of business, we'll get a fantastic seed come tourney time.


    GU Class of '07

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    4,048

    Default

    our game plan should not, imo, count on the other guy missing.

    it should count on us rounding out our game, our weaknesses and Nevtelen nailed it.
    That's not at all what CDC or myself was saying. We aren't "counting" on the other team missing. We are playing great defense thus the 34% fga. We are also making opponents turn the ball over more than previous years, +6 a game. Also, we still have a +4 rebounding margin per game and that includes a -25 game against Tenn (a game we handily won). You can have all the conerns you want and if we lose a game because of rebounding I'll jump on your bandwagon. Until that happens (and I don't believe it will) these concerns are nothing more than trying to find something wrong with the team.

    On another point, I know there are divisions between those who love to see JH on the perimiter sinking threes. They make me cringe. We have perhaps the best lineup of shooters ever and our big guy at the top of the key ? If we could put Matt underneath, and not suffer any height loss, that might be different. But what we get is a void.
    That was the first game we consistently saw Josh out there and I believe it was on purpose as the coaching staff picked up that the Cougs bigs don't guard the perimeter very well. We just happened to have a big that can step out and knock those shots down. I would also liked to see this used against UConn if Thabeet is guarding Josh. Not only is a hard guard for Thabeet but it will also take him out of the key.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Spo Vegas
    Posts
    2,309

    Default

    %100 correct cggonzaga. No one is suggesting that Josh should hang out on the 3 point line all game, you have to change things up to give the opponent something else to defend. When Josh is square to the basket and is open, I would want him to shoot that almost every time. In case you haven't noticed, he's nailing the 3's....big time. As for rebounding, I am also in total agreement with cg. We're getting our share. If you want a perfect game, that's nice but it ain't ever going to happen; not by GU or anybody else. I guess if you feel the need to complain you could always harp on free throws, but I think we were 6-7 last night. I suppose you could rip on Gray for missing one.

    I'm sorry, I don't care for the negativity--we got something good here.
    It's peanut butter jelly time!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •