Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 39

Thread: Ira at the 4....stop already!!

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Spokane
    Posts
    279

    Default Ira at the 4....stop already!!

    I have seen this idea that Ira can/will provide backup minutes at the 4 next year so much that I finally had to post my strong disagreement.

    The facts are this....he's 6'4"--235lbs....only against a very small team will Mr. Ira get any run at the 4.....also, I saw nothing, in the 15 minutes of floor time he got last season, to indicate he could contribute at the 4 like Pendo.....

    This myth that Ira will get run at the 4 must stop!! Can't we all just accept that he's a wing, my monster hops.......Stop worrying about him getting some run at the 4 and pray god that he's working on his ball-handling and jumper; and if he gets some token minutes at the 4 next season against a small lineup from Portland State for example, then fine, but he won't be playing any serious minutes at the 4 in my humble opinion.......

    Unless you want to believe Ira has a bit of Chuck Barkley in him...please stop perpetuating this myth....

    PS: I have nothing against Ira at all and I would love to see him contribute in a meaningful way on the floor next season....I just do not see him at the 4 spot for significant/serious run......Let the bashing begin....

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Mt Fuji, Japan
    Posts
    31,321

    Default

    Hey now...he played 110 minutes last season...
    Go Zags!!! Just Foo'in around.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Roslyn, Washington
    Posts
    223

    Default

    Thank you for clearing that up.

    I mean, why have a 240 lb power forward when you already have a 200 pounder ready to go?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    9,501

    Default BParb

    Your ideas are intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    165

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bigparb View Post
    I have seen this idea that Ira can/will provide backup minutes at the 4 next year so much that I finally had to post my strong disagreement.

    The facts are this....he's 6'4"--235lbs....only against a very small team will Mr. Ira get any run at the 4.
    If you remember the Illinois team that made it to the final a few years back you may recall there power forward was Roger Powell. Powell stands a bulky 6'5 235lbs...hmm I do believe that Ira can play the 4 if called upon. Height is still somewhat overrated in basketball, while it's definitely helpful I still believe if a player uses there head, good positioning, footwork, etc..they can play about any position. I'm pretty sure Ira can jump higher and is stronger then most bigs he will face this coming year, he will be fine playing the 4.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    1,604

    Default

    If Ira is as good as we all thought he was when he came here last year than I see no reason why he could not contribute as a four. Especially in the WCC, what 4 do you see dominating Ira physically? Simpson from SMC is good but I think Ira could bully him around a little bit.

    Rob Jones played some four for USD last year and I recall him doing pretty good. Just because your not 6' 8'' it doesn't mean you can't play the four spot.

    We're weak at the four spot and crowed at 1,2,3 spots so why not try it out. If not at the four, do you really see him getting any sort of serious minutes game in game out? I think Ira could be very valuable next season at the four, if he learns the offense of course.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,492

    Default

    BParb - I'll stand up for you! Pretty amusing to think of IRA! as a 4. We have two pretty capable 4's: Josh and Austin - only one 5 Rob......I know.....maybe Pargo can be a 5, we have all seen how high he can jump on those stuffs!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    10,499

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BroncoZAG615 View Post
    If Ira is as good as we all thought he was when he came here last year than I see no reason why he could not contribute as a four. Especially in the WCC, what 4 do you see dominating Ira physically? Simpson from SMC is good but I think Ira could bully him around a little bit.

    Rob Jones played some four for USD last year and I recall him doing pretty good. Just because your not 6' 8'' it doesn't mean you can't play the four spot.

    We're weak at the four spot and crowed at 1,2,3 spots so why not try it out. If not at the four, do you really see him getting any sort of serious minutes game in game out? I think Ira could be very valuable next season at the four, if he learns the offense of course.
    Because he's 6'3, despite being listed as 6'4. What is wrong with you people? Yes he has the body of a Greek God, a 6'3 Greek God. He didn't play 1 minute at the 4 last year. UGH!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    6,741

    Default

    spy's got a man crush

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Tacoma, WA
    Posts
    721

    Default

    Honestly, I saw nothing in Ira's play to even warrant him getting significant playing time. Spectacularly missed putback jams and often seeming confused out on the floor do not bode well for future play.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    8,338

    Default

    I think Ira can definitely play the 4 either against smaller teams or if we play a 2-3 zone on defense. In these scenarios he won't get stuck one-on-one in the post against a taller player.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    The Steel City
    Posts
    278

    Default

    The other thing to remember is injuries. There's a reason they put together a depth chart. Right now, I'm not sure there's a better third option at the 4 (after Josh and Austin) than Ira.

    Since Josh hasn't gone an entire season without an injury, you have to think about these things.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Near Nature, Near Perfect
    Posts
    2,166

    Default

    If Ira can't play at the 4 spot he isn't going to play much. He sure isn't going to take over at a guard spot. To play the 3 he is going to have to unseat Austin and Micah. Seems like a tall order. I'd like to see him get time at the 4.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    seattle
    Posts
    12

    Default more pie-in-the-sky dreamers

    ANY consideration of Ira at the 4 spot in ANY division one program, let alone Gonzaga (any top 25 team), is beyond ludicrous to the point of absurdity.

    Be realistic people - how many 6'6" or smaller power forwards do think there are in Div 1? And as for "height is overrated..."? Since when? Height is slightly overrated if a post is 6"9 matched up against a 7 footer, but 6'4"?? Please stop using Barkely as an example, since he is the only person in this size range that ever had any success over time.

    The ONLY chance a player of Ira's size would have in the low post on a consistent basis against even scrub posts of 6'9" or bigger would be if he had:

    1. footwork and body control - not only naturally superior talent in this area, but due to his size, would have to be barkely-esque. IF Ira showed that kind of footwork and body control, plus the touch to get a 6 ft shot against much taller posts, he wouldnt' have been at a JC before he came to us.

    2. experience with shot angles and post defenders - i don't care how good footwork and body strength/control are, NO 6'4" post is going to be worth a dime unless he has played for years at that position against much taller defenders, working shot angles around, under, and occasionally over taller posts. Ira has no such experience, and as pointed out, didn't get any last year nor did he show the talent to do so. IF HE HAD, do you really think Few would have let him ride the bench so much?

    3. Long wingspan & a large posterior put to maximum use - the only way a post Ira's size will even get a CHANCE to use the aforementioned angles and footwork to get shot off, is IF he has long arms and a butt that he knows how to use and enjoys using (back to the basket is natural). Barkely was an anomoly because he had all of these qualities, plus a quick jump. Mostly though, Barkely used his backside to create space to get his shots off. He was natural at it - is Ira? maybe in time, but certainly has shown nothing yet.

    So please, come back to reality people. Ira is not, nor will he ever be, any kind of post player. If we are lucky, Ira will learn the game and our system (oh yeah, he is lacking here too), and be a pendo/gurganious cross. a hustle player who boards, set picks, puts back trash, runs the break, and maybe, defends like a demon.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,671

    Default

    Oh Zig, one question. If he is going to be like Pendo, what position did he play?

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    seattle
    Posts
    12

    Default

    If we are lucky, Ira will learn the game and our system (oh yeah, he is lacking here too), and be a pendo/gurganious cross. a hustle player who boards, set picks, puts back trash, runs the break, and maybe, defends like a demon.

    Cross means combination...

    And Pendo was no 4 - get real. He played with his heart and head; he epitomized Gonzaga's best 4 year players. But he was a scrapper.

    How many passes were dumped down low to Pendo when he was playing the "4"? I can't remember a single one. Let's hope Ira, with one year left, can play with half as much heart and brains and bball IQ as Pendo did, and THEN, Ira will get some PT, and no one will care what position he is in (but it won't be the 4 or 5).

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    6,741

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by spudzag View Post
    If Ira can't play at the 4 spot he isn't going to play much. He sure isn't going to take over at a guard spot. To play the 3 he is going to have to unseat Austin and Micah. Seems like a tall order. I'd like to see him get time at the 4.
    Good post. I think this is his best option for PT...not the best fit, but his best option and likely the best option for Few and Co.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    6,741

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ziggarut View Post
    If we are lucky, Ira will learn the game and our system (oh yeah, he is lacking here too), and be a pendo/gurganious cross. a hustle player who boards, set picks, puts back trash, runs the break, and maybe, defends like a demon.

    Cross means combination...

    And Pendo was no 4 - get real. He played with his heart and head; he epitomized Gonzaga's best 4 year players. But he was a scrapper.

    How many passes were dumped down low to Pendo when he was playing the "4"? I can't remember a single one. Let's hope Ira, with one year left, can play with half as much heart and brains and bball IQ as Pendo did, and THEN, Ira will get some PT, and no one will care what position he is in (but it won't be the 4 or 5).
    Pendo wasn't a 4, Austin's not a 4, and Ira's not a 4 BUT with a 3 guard starting line-up, players are going to play out of position.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,172

    Default

    Everyone's got an opinion. Here is mine. You don't necessarily have to be a post player to play the 4. Pendo was not, and he did fine. We are thin at 4, and anyone who thinks Josh is going to be allowed to play there is kidding themselves. That leaves no one to back up Daye, who is already playing out of what his eventual NBA position will be (and is also not a post player). Ira will probably get some time at the 4, and we will have to make the best of it. I think if he learns the system a little better over the summer, he can be effective spelling someone at the 4 occasionally. We don't have a lot of options.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    seattle
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Pendo wasn't a 4, Austin's not a 4, and Ira's not a 4 BUT with a 3 guard starting line-up, players are going to play out of position

    AGREED! BUT, with all due respect, just because you give a Pinto a new engine, a paint job and new wheels, it does not become a sports car. Just because we play 3 guards, and add Ira (if that happens) he does NOT become a 4. It just means we are playing 3 guards, a small forward (IRA), and whoever our 5th is...

    And our 5th does not become a 5 or center just because he is the tallest player on the floor and the 5th man out after our 4 guards...

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    101

    Default Undersized 4

    Dior Lowhorn is maybe 6'6", but he is effective at the WCC level due to his long arms, ability to get off the floor quickly the high release point of his jumper. He is able to score over taller players. So it isn't out of the question to be effective as a smaller post man. I agree that it is rare though.

  22. #22

    Default

    amen to this post. When reading about Ira playing the four i laughed. Joey Dorsey played the four last year. Do you think at 6'4, 235 Ira Brown could stop Joey Dorsey from scoring or even have a remote chance to score with his back to the basket on Dorsey? I think not. No way he plays the four, he is at most a 3, probably a two. However he needs to work on his jumper and midrange game if he plans on getting minutes at the two.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,671

    Smile

    I think most of us are concerned about our depth at the 4/5. We have heighth but they are not a true power foward. At the 4/5 we really only have Josh/Foster/Sacre as true candidates for the power forward/center. But we do have other heighth in Austin/Micah and some bulk/rebounding/speed/hustle in Ira to help out. That may mean that the coaches have to do some things with smoke and mirrors (like special zones) to rest players in certain games.

    But I think that when you look at the team as a whole they should be very competitive. If we can stay away from injuries, this team should be competitive in every game they play. This team will also require finding the chemistry and the coaches have to learn how to sub to get the most out of the players.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Fort Lauderdale, FL
    Posts
    34

    Default

    The only time we will see Ira at the 4 is when there is an injury or foul trouble. Even then it will not be a traditional 4 man. He will be called upon to guard guys taller than he is, but I don't ever see him posting his man up and making back to the basket type moves on a regular basis. That is just not his game.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    88

    Default

    1, 2, 3, 4, & 5... theyre all just numbers, and when youre on a fast break, or running flex, it really doesnt matter what # you call yourself.. Austin was coined a "4" last year, sure, hes 6' 10", but how often was he posting someone up? He was effective facing the basket (among other things), and putting the ball on the floor. Why not Ira! too? Coach Few will put the best players on the floor, if Ira! happens to be one of them, so be it. Makes sense to me.

    Defensively speaking, well, might have to play Zone if Ira!'s size creates a mismatch problem. Seems to me he would be pretty darn good closing out on a wing though (quick, strong, fast).

    Just my $.02

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •