Why has it become so quiet on the PN Western front?
Quiet?
Collapse
X
-
Jarron Cumberland & Shamorie Ponds are also guys that have been rumoured to be grad transfer possibilities. (& both had coaches leave this offseason)
Still tons of time and lots of different possibilities and I'm sure the staff are exploring all options. (including holding steady and seeing what Ravet/Ayayi/Foster can do)Last edited by OntZags; 05-11-2019, 02:37 PM.
-
-
Originally posted by thespywhozaggedme20ppg, 5apg, 4rpg on 45% from the field and 35% from 3; 37 vs Georgia Tech, 37, 6assists, 3rebs vs Georgetown, 27/5/3 vs Seton Hall, 26/8/8 vs Creighton. He'd immediately be the most dynamic guard to ever play for us. The kid has East Coast swagger in spades and if our backcourt was him and Gilder next season...WOW! One can only dream.
Complete career NBA stats for the Toronto Raptors Point Guard Shamorie Ponds on ESPN. Includes points, rebounds, and assists.
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-bas...shamorie-ponds
Any of the 3 would be awesome and as good as we could realistically hope for at this point. I think I'd personally prefer Cumberland as he is the strongest defender and a duo of him and Gilder would lock it down. We'd be a little lacking on the playmaking front but you intersperse Ravet with those two and I think it could work out. (plus some of the bigs coming can facilitate as well)
Who knows if any actually become available but you can't turn down any of the 3. It would vault GU into instant contender status.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jazzdelmar View PostShamorie under Few?????? If you thought Norvell needed a long leash.....no way.
Comment
-
-
Reactions on this board are sometimes way out of proportion to what was initially offered. Nowhere can I find anyone saying Ponds isn't a very good player. What was said, in so many words, is that Ponds plays with even more reckless abandon than Zach. That's not a bad thing, in and of itself, but we're talking about Mark Few here. Mr. Few would be looking for a governor on Ponds motor in order to keep the Zags offense running the way he wants. I'd be surprised if he turned out to be a good fit.
Comment
-
-
Thx Mark. Spot on.
Originally posted by Markburn1 View PostReactions on this board are sometimes way out of proportion to what was initially offered. Nowhere can I find anyone saying Ponds isn't a very good player. What was said, in so many words, is that Ponds plays with even more reckless abandon than Zach. That's not a bad thing, in and of itself, but we're talking about Mark Few here. Mr. Few would be looking for a governor on Ponds motor in order to keep the Zags offense running the way he wants. I'd be surprised if he turned out to be a good fit.
Comment
-
-
Ponds is a very good player, not a great 3point shooter. However he is lightning quick and can take it to the hole. He plays wild and crazy at times, but sometimes wild and crazy are good, it makes you unpredictable. I have to say as organized as Coach Few is, I don't know how much wild and crazy he would take. I guess when Shomarie got to out of control, we could bring in Ravet. I think Ponds would be an excellent addition, because you can never have enough quickness, just like you can never have enough shooters.
Comment
-
-
From the little I saw of St John's last yr I tend to agree w/ Jazz on this one. Great talent but would have to change his game a bunch in a short time to play for the Zags. Probably a questionable fit imo; Zags' success is largely based on effective use of the posts, and the perimeter guys are expected to space the floor for the inside game.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by TheOtherGreatOne View PostPonds is a very good player, not a great 3point shooter. However he is lightning quick and can take it to the hole. He plays wild and crazy at times, but sometimes wild and crazy are good, it makes you unpredictable. I have to say as organized as Coach Few is, I don't know how much wild and crazy he would take. I guess when Shomarie got to out of control, we could bring in Ravet. I think Ponds would be an excellent addition, because you can never have enough quickness, just like you can never have enough shooters.
It's okay to have a guy who is a 33% 3 pt. shooter so long as he is surrounded by some guys who can really shoot it. A super quick guard get into the lane, meets a wall, been then sees Kispert at the wing with a wide open, stand up 3 pointer....it's money in the bank.
Comment
-
Comment