What are the tie-breakers, and which team would hold the upper hand? This query ignores the fact that St. Mary’s has the easier schedule down the stretch.
If the Zags Win in Moraga, and Tie with St. Mary’s for Championship . . .
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by TravelinZag View PostWhat are the tie-breakers, and which team would hold the upper hand? This query ignores the fact that St. Mary’s has the easier schedule down the stretch.
-
-
Originally posted by TravelinZag View PostWhat are the tie-breakers, and which team would hold the upper hand? This query ignores the fact that St. Mary’s has the easier schedule down the stretch.
A. If there is a tie in the standings, regardless of the number of teams involved, the following factors shall be used, in this order, until all ties are broken:
1. Head-to-head competition.
2. Won-Loss record versus each league member (or the cumulative record of teams tied in a position) based on descending order of finish in the final Conference standings.
3. This comparison on a descending basis will continue until seeding is complete. If a tie still exists, the final deciding factor will be the teams’ placement in the most recent Collegiate Basketball News Company RPI published by Jim Sukup.
B. In the event of a tie involving more than two teams, the same tie-breaking process is used until one team is removed from the deadlock.
1. Once a team is removed from the tie, the remaining ties are broken by reverting back to the first step in the procedure (head-to-head competition).
2. The procedure will then continue (comparing results on a descending basis), always reverting back to head-to-head competition to break remaining ties.
C. If there is more than one tie in the standings, the tie, which can be broken via the earliest tie-breaking step, will be broken first.
1. The review will begin with the lower tie.
2. If the lower tie cannot be resolved under step one (B1), the higher tie will be considered.
3. If the higher tie cannot be resolved via step one, the lower tie will be reviewed under step two (B2).
4. If the lower tie cannot be resolved under step two, then the higher tie will be considered under step two.
5. This process of alternating consideration will continue until one of the ties is resolved.
6. Once a tie is resolved, the remaining tie will revert to step one of the system.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by gaels87 View Posttiebreakers from the WCC....
A. If there is a tie in the standings, regardless of the number of teams involved, the following factors shall be used, in this order, until all ties are broken:
1. Head-to-head competition.
2. Won-Loss record versus each league member (or the cumulative record of teams tied in a position) based on descending order of finish in the final Conference standings.
3. This comparison on a descending basis will continue until seeding is complete. If a tie still exists, the final deciding factor will be the teams’ placement in the most recent Collegiate Basketball News Company RPI published by Jim Sukup.
B. In the event of a tie involving more than two teams, the same tie-breaking process is used until one team is removed from the deadlock.
1. Once a team is removed from the tie, the remaining ties are broken by reverting back to the first step in the procedure (head-to-head competition).
2. The procedure will then continue (comparing results on a descending basis), always reverting back to head-to-head competition to break remaining ties.
C. If there is more than one tie in the standings, the tie, which can be broken via the earliest tie-breaking step, will be broken first.
1. The review will begin with the lower tie.
2. If the lower tie cannot be resolved under step one (B1), the higher tie will be considered.
3. If the higher tie cannot be resolved via step one, the lower tie will be reviewed under step two (B2).
4. If the lower tie cannot be resolved under step two, then the higher tie will be considered under step two.
5. This process of alternating consideration will continue until one of the ties is resolved.
6. Once a tie is resolved, the remaining tie will revert to step one of the system.Birds aren’t real.
Comment
-
-
This isn't scientific by any means, but within one conference I've always thought the RPI wasn't an awful comparison (maybe arguable). Whatever tiebreaker you use at that point isn't going to be great anyway. You're at the end of the tiebreaker rope already. While we're ahead of St. Mary's in KenPom and Sagarin, it's not by much, and Sagarin has St. Mary's ahead of us in the ranking more heavily weighted towards recent games, and I think rightly so. Hoping that changes this weekend.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jake View PostThis isn't scientific by any means, but within one conference I've always thought the RPI wasn't an awful comparison (maybe arguable). Whatever tiebreaker you use at that point isn't going to be great anyway. You're at the end of the tiebreaker rope already. While we're ahead of St. Mary's in KenPom and Sagarin, it's not by much, and Sagarin has St. Mary's ahead of us in the ranking more heavily weighted towards recent games, and I think rightly so. Hoping that changes this weekend.Not even a smile? What's your problem!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by willandi View PostExcepting that the SMC RPI gets a boost by playing the Zags twice, their toughest opponent of the year. Gonzaga doesn't get to play the Zags, so, despite a harder OOC schedule, and the same in conference schedule, SMC is given the tie breaker...because Gonzaga plays tougher opponents.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by CDC84 View PostAccording to realtimerpi.com, GU is at 47, Saint Mary's is at 25. BYU is at 71. The WCC is at 12.
SMC had no games against RPI 1-25, they are 2-0 against 26-50 and 2-1 51-100. The have a LRPI (road and neutral games only) of 73
Zags are 2-1 against RPI 1-25. 2-2 on 26-50 and 1-0 for 51-100. Zags LRPI is 48.
Seems like the Zags schedule was tougher and they lose by not playing themselves.
SMC is 30 RPI on ESPN and Zags are 49.Not even a smile? What's your problem!
Comment
-
-
I’m happy to be a Zag fan. Happy our team still gets out there and plays anyone, anywhere. Let Gael fans be happy with playing it safe and betting their entire post season on beating Gonzaga. Because that’s worked so well building a national program?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by JAGzag View PostI’m happy to be a Zag fan. Happy our team still gets out there and plays anyone, anywhere. Let Gael fans be happy with playing it safe and betting their entire post season on beating Gonzaga. Because that’s worked so well building a national program?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ezag View PostNo tie then, beat them outright! Have to contain Landale!
It's pick your poison against the Gaels.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by willandi View PostExcepting that the SMC RPI gets a boost by playing the Zags twice, their toughest opponent of the year. Gonzaga doesn't get to play the Zags, so, despite a harder OOC schedule, and the same in conference schedule, SMC is given the tie breaker...because Gonzaga plays tougher opponents.
Comment
-
Comment