About the 10 minute mark of the first half last night, I think the game was tied. Immediately Vitale goes into the "could we have an upset on our hands" mode. He literally said that he was very surprised that the game wasn't on it's way to a blow out yet. Yes, that's right, the 10 minute mark in the first half.
The typical big shot national TV announcer who has watched probably viewed zero WCC games all season.
I watched each single minute of every single league game this season, and honestly, only a couple of Gonzaga games got out of hand 10-15 minutes into the game. It is very normal for GU to bring a 13 pt. lead into the half. And then the combination of 2nd half adjustments and overall player talent and depth wears the other team down, and a big separation happens.
Obviously, that blow out didn't occur last night. The combination of SCU playing for their lives plus Sendek's coaching plus Brownridge's talent probably meant that GU wasn't going to beat them by 30+ again. But give me a break, Vitale. Does his beloved Dukies get the same criticism if they aren't beating BC by 20 pts. at the 10 minute mark in the 1st half?
The typical big shot national TV announcer who has watched probably viewed zero WCC games all season.
I watched each single minute of every single league game this season, and honestly, only a couple of Gonzaga games got out of hand 10-15 minutes into the game. It is very normal for GU to bring a 13 pt. lead into the half. And then the combination of 2nd half adjustments and overall player talent and depth wears the other team down, and a big separation happens.
Obviously, that blow out didn't occur last night. The combination of SCU playing for their lives plus Sendek's coaching plus Brownridge's talent probably meant that GU wasn't going to beat them by 30+ again. But give me a break, Vitale. Does his beloved Dukies get the same criticism if they aren't beating BC by 20 pts. at the 10 minute mark in the 1st half?
Comment