"...it's always a paltry, feeble, tiny mind that takes pleasure in revenge." Roman philosopher Juvenal, 120 AD.
"Mark my words: A 20 point throttling..."
"Shouldn't be close. 12 to 15 points..."
"... the game won't even be close unless one of SMC's guards gets hot..." (prophetic, at least)
"I feel a top ten SC play coming on..."
"I just want a real beat down. Make a statement..."
"I'm sure (the Zags) want revenge...what I would give for a blow out pummeling..."
Notice all the 'I's in there? I've been right there. Not asking a lot. A scalping would do, and if not that, we'll settle for some tar and feathers. Way past that now. Just rejoicing in the still confounding achievements of the little Jebbie school out in the Big Sky forests.
Some posters here are making their commentary sound very much like the Kentucky board (don't go there) or Tarheel central (ditto). And that makes me yearn for the bad old days when we were getting routinely "pummeled" by the dudes at Pepperdine and Santa Clara. Drink fueled nostalgia actually had me rooting for SMC's determined, underdog, second half comeback. That's where the Bulldogs of the '70's, 80's & 90's routinely found themselves. Took some pleasure in the game thread mewlings of the above posters (& their ilk) when it looked like it all might be slipping away in the second half.
The irony of criticizing the Zag players for not meeting a poster's unenlightened, ill informed, unrealistic expectations, is simply off the charts. Or to say the game was close at the end because we got hosed by the refs in the second half, it's ulta-irony. And, it's almost always the folks who want blood who express the greatest outrage when they don't get it.
"We" are not like that. Like the UK rednecks, the (name the worst)... there are plenty of examples from the message boards of teams GU has beaten. Are we like them? Sixteen and one. Really been ugly, but, yeah, it could have been worse & it will be further on up the road. Our mantra when that happens: BIG SKY, BIG SKY, BIG SKY, OOOOUUM.
"Mark my words: A 20 point throttling..."
"Shouldn't be close. 12 to 15 points..."
"... the game won't even be close unless one of SMC's guards gets hot..." (prophetic, at least)
"I feel a top ten SC play coming on..."
"I just want a real beat down. Make a statement..."
"I'm sure (the Zags) want revenge...what I would give for a blow out pummeling..."
Notice all the 'I's in there? I've been right there. Not asking a lot. A scalping would do, and if not that, we'll settle for some tar and feathers. Way past that now. Just rejoicing in the still confounding achievements of the little Jebbie school out in the Big Sky forests.
Some posters here are making their commentary sound very much like the Kentucky board (don't go there) or Tarheel central (ditto). And that makes me yearn for the bad old days when we were getting routinely "pummeled" by the dudes at Pepperdine and Santa Clara. Drink fueled nostalgia actually had me rooting for SMC's determined, underdog, second half comeback. That's where the Bulldogs of the '70's, 80's & 90's routinely found themselves. Took some pleasure in the game thread mewlings of the above posters (& their ilk) when it looked like it all might be slipping away in the second half.
The irony of criticizing the Zag players for not meeting a poster's unenlightened, ill informed, unrealistic expectations, is simply off the charts. Or to say the game was close at the end because we got hosed by the refs in the second half, it's ulta-irony. And, it's almost always the folks who want blood who express the greatest outrage when they don't get it.
"We" are not like that. Like the UK rednecks, the (name the worst)... there are plenty of examples from the message boards of teams GU has beaten. Are we like them? Sixteen and one. Really been ugly, but, yeah, it could have been worse & it will be further on up the road. Our mantra when that happens: BIG SKY, BIG SKY, BIG SKY, OOOOUUM.
Comment