PDA

View Full Version : Osweiler's postion



kitzbuel
07-24-2007, 08:38 PM
It seems that we will have a few forwards (Poling, Davis and even Daye) when Osweiler shows up, does it seem plausible Brock could be playing center or at least some center?

sittingon50
07-24-2007, 09:15 PM
Pretty sure he'll be a banging "4".

Nevtelen
07-24-2007, 09:17 PM
Poling is a 5, isn't he? I'm pretty sure he's a back to the basket guy. That leaves us with Davis, basically, and Daye possibly, but I feel he's probably more of a 3. If we're lucky enough to land Jordan Morgan, he'd be another 4, though.

Scotto
07-24-2007, 09:32 PM
Poling is more of a 4. He's got a solid 15' jumper and a classic high post guy.

Fonebone
07-24-2007, 09:40 PM
I'm really not much of a technical basketball guy, but having watched Brock play a few times, I think that a lot of what he brings would be wasted at center. Josh is a terrific athlete, but he does not move with the ball like Brock does. I think that Brock moves with the ball like a 3 or even a 2. He is a quarterback after all - extreemly agile, coordinated and quick - in ways different than Josh is. I'm not saying he should play 3 or 2, just that the way he moves with the ball compares favorably with some of our guys at those positions.

I'm curious what some of the more CDC or Bob think about this.

kitzbuel
07-24-2007, 09:41 PM
Poling is a 5, isn't he? I'm pretty sure he's a back to the basket guy. That leaves us with Davis, basically, and Daye possibly, but I feel he's probably more of a 3. If we're lucky enough to land Jordan Morgan, he'd be another 4, though.
BZ has Poling slotted as a forward in his scholarship chart above.

kitzbuel
07-24-2007, 09:42 PM
I read that he plays a lot like Josh, in terms of his desire to shoot the 3 ball. However, saying that, he is listed as the #3 CENTER BY ONE OF The scouting sites I think in Southern cal.

I saw that, too. That is what piqued my curiosity.

Zagster
07-24-2007, 10:08 PM
Are you forgetting about Robert Sacre ??

JLGutrocks
07-24-2007, 11:46 PM
and 7'5" big Willy Foster.


[Are you forgetting about Robert Sacre ??

Nevtelen
07-25-2007, 06:31 AM
I stand corrected I guess. Hmmm... that does make things interesting. I'd say we probably need a 5 in the 09 class then.

CDC84
07-25-2007, 07:51 AM
Keep in mind that Brock might still grow a couple of inches. That could play a part in whether he is a 4 or 5 at the college level.

spudzag
07-25-2007, 07:54 AM
Think Jordan Morgan! ( 6-8, 245 with 2 years to grow)

cggonzaga
07-25-2007, 09:05 AM
Maybe we're missing the obvious here. When have we ever had a true "center"? I don't recall any. Dench, Rogers, Eaton, none of those guys was a true center. Ronny, JP and Casey were definitely fours. The offense we run isn't really conducive for having a true center. I personally wouldn't worry about it too much. There are guys in the coming years though that would fit the bill (Sacre, Foster).

BobZag
07-25-2007, 09:15 AM
PF.

lothar98zag
07-25-2007, 09:56 AM
Maybe we're missing the obvious here. When have we ever had a true "center"? I don't recall any. Dench, Rogers, Eaton, none of those guys was a true center. Ronny, JP and Casey were definitely fours. The offense we run isn't really conducive for having a true center. I personally wouldn't worry about it too much. There are guys in the coming years though that would fit the bill (Sacre, Foster).
I agree. GU, most of the time, plays 2 "bigs." There really isn't much difference between a PF & a C in GU's game - except maybe the C plays under the hoop in the 2-3 zone D...

BobZag
07-25-2007, 10:32 AM
Big Sexy. :)

I still see a lot of Matthew Knight (LMU) in Brock's game. Brock could end up being more of a power player than Knight was, but it's the best comparison I know of for him thus far.

sittingon50
07-25-2007, 11:30 AM
I loved Knight. If Brock reaches his skill level I will be pleased!:)