PDA

View Full Version : Lunardi says no, no, no, no, no!



BobZag
11-12-2009, 09:14 AM
This is pretty funny. Not his reply but the accidental repeat. Hmm, perhaps an omen? :o


Jeff (WA)


Any hopes for a 3-5 Seed for my Zags?

Joe Lunardi (4:42 PM)


No.

Joe Lunardi (4:42 PM)


No.

Joe Lunardi (4:43 PM)


No.

Joe Lunardi (4:43 PM)


No.

Joe Lunardi (4:44 PM)


Sorry....didn't mean to submit that many "no's" about Gonzaga! Time for one more question....

lol.

adoptedzag
11-12-2009, 09:19 AM
lol, I didn't know he felt so strongly!

ZagnetitForce
11-12-2009, 09:58 AM
So a 1 or 2 it is! Great!!!!!!!! :D

kitzbuel
11-12-2009, 10:25 AM
This is pretty funny. Not his reply but the accidental repeat. Hmm, perhaps an omen? :o



lol.
So how many 'no's did he mean to submit?

BobZag
11-12-2009, 10:31 AM
So how many 'no's did he mean to submit?

Is this a trick question? :rolleyes:

kylasdad
11-12-2009, 10:36 AM
I bet he is wrong.

Baldwinzag
11-12-2009, 10:38 AM
So how many 'no's did he mean to submit?

He said 'no' so many times, he actually meant 'yes'.

http://elproyectomatriz.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/no-no-no.jpg

ID ZAGFAN
11-12-2009, 10:52 AM
So a 1 or 2 it is! Great!!!!!!!! :D

the way you think! :D

ID ZAGFAN

webspinnre
11-12-2009, 11:11 AM
I wouldnt be remotely surprised for us to end up in the 4-6 seed range.

Ziggy
11-12-2009, 11:17 AM
He said 'no' so many times, he actually meant 'yes'.

http://elproyectomatriz.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/no-no-no.jpg

That's true, a double-double negative (four no's) means yes!

TheZagPhish
11-12-2009, 11:23 AM
That's true, a double-double negative (four no's) means yes!

Holy crap! Lunardi got a double-double?!

Pleasant Peninsula
11-12-2009, 11:41 AM
I find it strange that Lunardi would so abruptly, not to mention repeatedly, denounce the Zags chances of earning a high seed. I would think that any team that is projected to be in the tournament at the 8-11 range has a reasonable chance of moving up.

I would have liked him to elaborate a bit more. I suspect that he feels it is unlikely, not because of the potential, however untested, of the team, but rather because of the schedule. Like some posters on this board, he may feel that our OOC schedule sets us up to have 9 or ten losses, which would no doubt take us out of top 5 seed contention.

I look at the schedule in a different way, however. I think the team only loses five or six games, and with the beast that is their a schedule, that should set them up pretty well in the 4 seed range, give or take.

Rangerzag
11-12-2009, 03:11 PM
Zags have been in the position of only loosing to good teams in the past. That holds no where near the same amount of water as having wins against top teams and no losses to not so good teams. If ya don't have some good wins, you don't hold near the same cards.