I thought the Zag players lost this game, not Few. Few managed the game terrificly and had an excellent game plan. 1. Get Thabeet on the bench by attacking. Zags did just that. 2. Make them shoot from the outside. That worked for about 3/4 of the game, but in the end that Zone back fired. But a great decision, during the game, to go with the match-up zone. 3. Setting up plays to attack the basket. We did that for most of the game, and it worked getting us an 11 point lead. The offense with Josh up at the post is the best offense. We've got plenty of guys who can score in the paint....Fans need to stop complaining about our lack of low post offense. We had way more points in the paint then UCONN in my opinion. 4. Great offensive execution of the offense.
The team lost this game by getting complacent and stopped attacking the rim. It began with a 3 on 2 fast break that Pargo did not attack and give the ball up for a layup. He pulled back and ended up getting the ball stolen. That was a big play I thought because it came off a steal. And then the team went into their biggest mistake....shooting long shots after one pass or just no passes. We began to shoot from the outside and not play defense with energy (complacency) and UCONN cuts the lead to 1. The Zags did bounce back and made a few good plays down the stretch. Daye made a great basket. And Matt shot some good free throws. Steven Gray missed one on that technical on Thabeet, and that was huge.
In the final analysis the team plays the game. They either make the plays or they don't. Price hitting a number of tough shots, and especially his last, does not make Calhoon a better coach than Few. Price showed us what it takes to win a game like this...it takes someone who refuses to lose. Before Price hits that shot, Dyson misses his 3 attempt, and we do not get the rebound, thus giveing Price a chance to win the game. Do we have this quality? I believe we do. Pargo had a pretty good game, but not his best for sure. He did some good scoring when we needed those points. His handicap is that he isn't really a point guard by nature. He just doesn't seem to think like one imo. Can he get better? I hope so. He has most of the season left to do that. We are a long ways from March. Right now Price is a better point guard than Pargo. But we have a long way to go...and I'm sticking with Pargo.
I THOUGHT FEW COACHED A GREAT GAME
The team lost this game by getting complacent and stopped attacking the rim. It began with a 3 on 2 fast break that Pargo did not attack and give the ball up for a layup. He pulled back and ended up getting the ball stolen. That was a big play I thought because it came off a steal. And then the team went into their biggest mistake....shooting long shots after one pass or just no passes. We began to shoot from the outside and not play defense with energy (complacency) and UCONN cuts the lead to 1. The Zags did bounce back and made a few good plays down the stretch. Daye made a great basket. And Matt shot some good free throws. Steven Gray missed one on that technical on Thabeet, and that was huge.
In the final analysis the team plays the game. They either make the plays or they don't. Price hitting a number of tough shots, and especially his last, does not make Calhoon a better coach than Few. Price showed us what it takes to win a game like this...it takes someone who refuses to lose. Before Price hits that shot, Dyson misses his 3 attempt, and we do not get the rebound, thus giveing Price a chance to win the game. Do we have this quality? I believe we do. Pargo had a pretty good game, but not his best for sure. He did some good scoring when we needed those points. His handicap is that he isn't really a point guard by nature. He just doesn't seem to think like one imo. Can he get better? I hope so. He has most of the season left to do that. We are a long ways from March. Right now Price is a better point guard than Pargo. But we have a long way to go...and I'm sticking with Pargo.
I THOUGHT FEW COACHED A GREAT GAME
Comment